Go Back   vb.org Archive > Community Central > vBulletin.org Site Feedback
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-28-2006, 02:04 AM
TECK's Avatar
TECK TECK is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,182
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default Hacks separated in forums (with no prefixes)

I'm going to open a thread, in order to avoid discussions in the wrong place.
I mentioned in other posts that the best way to display the hacks database is to separate it in categories(forums), where you can click and get your results righaway, not to navigate through a zillion options in order to get your results.

What do you guys think?

This thread is in response to the following posts:
Quote:
Originally Posted by TECK
vBHackers.com gets my vote. It looks/feels like the old vB.org, before everything got bad.
Easy to navigate, you find your hacks righaway.
All they need is a 'Help me finish' forum like in the old times...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul M
My interest is not really about that particular argument, rather that someone thinks that the system there is wonderful, easy to navigate and finds things easily, and at the same time implying that the system here is bad, when infact they are identical (with the exception that vb.org seperates out 3.5 and 3.6 mods). Most curious.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-28-2006, 02:45 AM
Paul M's Avatar
Paul M Paul M is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 23,748
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

The reply you quote is actually the second reply, this is the first, that was in direct response to your quoted post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul M
.... as far as i can see, they use exactly the same system as here - a single forum with thread prefixes (in fact, they don't seperate 3.5 and 3.6). From a quick look even the thread prefixes look the same.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-28-2006, 03:26 AM
Regs Regs is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 322
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Teck,

Are you and the other detractors who want the "old days back" purposely avoiding the 'townhall' thread?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-28-2006, 04:27 AM
TECK's Avatar
TECK TECK is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,182
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul M
The reply you quote is actually the second reply, this is the first, that was in direct response to your quoted post.
Thanks Paul for adding it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Regs
Teck,

Are you and the other detractors who want the "old days back" purposely avoiding the 'townhall' thread?
Hi Regs, is really unapropriate the expression you used: detractor.
I simply wanted to state my own oppinion about a better design and in the same time, I wanted to see what do you guys think. If my idea is bad and other members decide is better the new design, I'm professional enough to accept it... I'm not obtuze.

But that does not stop me from expressing my own oppinion, in a polite way ofcourse.
In the townhall you can only express yourself in one single post, that's all. I might be wrong, please correct me.

Regards,

Floren
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-28-2006, 05:57 AM
Ntfu2 Ntfu2 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,247
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

How many threads regarding the same thing do we need?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-28-2006, 06:16 AM
TECK's Avatar
TECK TECK is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,182
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I did not noticed there were similar threads opened.
If that's the case, please close it. I apologize for the inconvenience I created, I will search this forum.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-28-2006, 06:28 AM
Ntfu2 Ntfu2 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,247
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

No big deal to me It just seems as if there are like 50 threads a week regarding the layout of stuff

no harm no foul
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-28-2006, 08:15 AM
BamaStangGuy's Avatar
BamaStangGuy BamaStangGuy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Alabama
Posts: 521
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ntfu2
No big deal to me It just seems as if there are like 50 threads a week regarding the layout of stuff

no harm no foul
Maybe that should be a sign that people dont like the current layout....
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-28-2006, 11:45 AM
Chris M's Avatar
Chris M Chris M is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 6,186
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I personally believe that the old system is more robust, and defines things easier...

However I am willing to wait and see how this is changed for the better

Chris
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.05073 seconds
  • Memory Usage 2,239KB
  • Queries Executed 11 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)SHOWTHREAD
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (1)ad_showthread_beforeqr
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost_sig
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost_start
  • (6)bbcode_quote
  • (1)footer
  • (1)forumjump
  • (1)forumrules
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (1)navbar
  • (3)navbar_link
  • (120)option
  • (9)post_thanks_box
  • (9)post_thanks_button
  • (1)post_thanks_javascript
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (9)post_thanks_postbit_info
  • (9)postbit
  • (9)postbit_onlinestatus
  • (9)postbit_wrapper
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open
  • (1)tagbit_wrapper 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • inlinemod
  • postbit
  • posting
  • reputationlevel
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./showthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php
  • ./includes/class_postbit.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_reputation.php
  • ./includes/functions_post_thanks.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • showthread_start
  • showthread_getinfo
  • forumjump
  • showthread_post_start
  • showthread_query_postids
  • showthread_query
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • showthread_postbit_create
  • postbit_factory
  • postbit_display_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_end
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_start
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_end
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_start
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_end
  • fetch_musername
  • postbit_imicons
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • postbit_display_complete
  • post_thanks_function_can_thank_this_post_start
  • tag_fetchbit_complete
  • forumrules
  • navbits
  • navbits_complete
  • showthread_complete