We should be able to attach .js files...

[Naan-Kadavul]

.rar , .zip, .7z

anything which is compressed into small format is not so secured in my view.

[Paul M]

Originally Posted by BirdOPrey5

Continuing to do something simply for the sake because 'that's how it's always been' is quite sad actually... :down:

Why have feedback forum at all if the answer is always 'because we always have done it that way.' ?

Originally Posted by Animemike

Defo should add ".rar" ^^

Changing something just for the sake of changing it is also pointless. Having a feedback forum does not mean every suggestion is going to get implemented. Its been considered, and rejected. Its sad that some cannot handle rejection very well.

Originally Posted by Naan-Kadavul

Rar files are not secured. Virus problem may arise. So lets avoid .rar extensions as an attachment.

Not really sure what this means - how are .rar files more (or less) secure than zip files ?

BTW, rar files have also been considered in the past, but it was decided that zips are the common compression method that everyone can handle - if people used rar they would have to provide a zip as well, which rather defeats the purpose.

[Xencored]

Originally Posted by Paul M

Having a feedback forum does not mean every suggestion is going to get implemented. Its been considered, and rejected. Its sad that some cannot handle rejection very well.

What the hell? get out the wrong side of the bed today Paul?

Ive never seen it asked before than again ive never looked. I saw this thread and thought i would ask (as most of my files are Rar's)

i think your

Originally Posted by Paul M

Its sad that some cannot handle rejection very well.

Was wayyyy OTT ....

[BirdOPrey5]

Originally Posted by Paul M

Changing something just for the sake of changing it is also pointless. Having a feedback forum does not mean every suggestion is going to get implemented. Its been considered, and rejected. Its sad that some cannot handle rejection very well.

I can handle rejection fine if it's based on logic. Give me a good reason not to do this-
A security issue (though this doesn't seem to be the case)
It would break something else (also not true)
It would make life harder for someone (again not true)
But if any of the above were true I would take it as a good reason and go about my day. Instead the only reason I'm given is 'because it's always been done that way' and that is NOT a reason at all.

Unless a new point is raised I'm done commenting on this, my position has been made known and I've given several reasons why it's a good idea and no one has given a good reason why it's a bad idea. Period.

As for .rar files I couldn't care less... zips are much more popular and do the same thing so I don't see a need but if you want to give the mod authors the choice, that's fine too- I'd never use it because there are lots of people who can unzip files (it's built into windows) who would need to have their hands held to unrar a file.

[Paul M]

Originally Posted by Animemike

What the hell? get out the wrong side of the bed today Paul?

Nope.

Originally Posted by Animemike

Ive never seen it asked before than again ive never looked. I saw this thread and thought i would ask (as most of my files are Rar's)

i think your
Was wayyyy OTT ....

I never mentioned any names (or suggestions either), your assumption that its directed purely at you is OTT. :erm:

[kh99]

Originally Posted by Paul M

I dont see how you conclude that.

I think it was the little winking icon, but sorry if I misunderstood.

[BirdOPrey5]

Also .css files.

[Xencored]

Originally Posted by Paul M

Nope.


I never mentioned any names (or suggestions either), your assumption that its directed purely at you is OTT. :erm:

Hehe you quoted me :up:

[Marco van Herwaarden]

Closing as the original question is answered and the thread only goes off topic now.