The Arcive of vBulletin Modifications Site. |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I couldn't help but notice the new signature rule that does not allow dynamic php image signatures (being very popular among vB users).
Any particular reason for this? :ermm: |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
If it creates a cookie or gathers info, it's not looked upon kindly. Privacy issues. Not to mention, they're just plain annoying.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
If we're talking about annoying, then is there anything that can be done about Hellsatan's here that takes forever to load and then offers up a missing image?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If you look at MarcoH64's sig --- Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Try reading it fully again
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
:X Rofl lol
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Okay, both of you, calm down.
I imagine that many members would find dynamic PHP sigs annoying, I am one of them. I dislike image sigs alltogether as I see them as a waste of my download limits, not to mention they lag threads and make them load slower for everyone. Fast Board > Pointless image sigs. |
![]() |
|
|