The Arcive of Official vBulletin Modifications Site.It is not a VB3 engine, just a parsed copy! |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The double post feature is not helpful!
Sorry to say but there are times in a conversation where one would like
to updates a thread and not add to an existing post... I have a thread going where no one can tell if there are any changes in it when I was to report back about my progress on a modification. very frustrating! there should be a way to force a new thread or something so that we can control weather or not its an update to an already existing post or an update or new development in an ongoing thread. |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You might want to specify which forums it would be good to be turned off in. To blanket say 'It is not helpful' is unlikely to get you the desired outcome. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
in Modification Requests
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It's not helpful and has caused the search function to break here on vb.org.
There's a blanket statement. Doesn't this auto-merged thing actually inhibit the normal sense of information acquisition? When 'conversing' with someone, this hack requires RE-READING material to make sure you haven't missed something. Who benefits from that? Cheers, ~Regs. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
I think the hack in question under its current state is causing more problems for
otherwise better members than the troublesome ones you speak of. I hope this does not turn into another example of functionality loss as a result of other peoples abuses. As I see it the forum functionality has gone from good to sub standard since this hack was activated. Additionally I have no doubt in the fact that there is room for further development on this hack and that it could be used without these side effects. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
#8
|
||||||
|
||||||
Quote:
Reading about how people invent new ways of complaining about this is hilarious reading. Quote:
If your new reply is so major that it would actually justify a new post, then it deserves its own thread. If your thread is so popular and your topic is so damn cool that you just HAVE to keep people up to date with what you are doing now in relation to 5 minutes ago, there is BOUND to be someone replying. If not, read point #1. Quote:
Oh, and BTW: You are saying that the Edit Post function should be removed, because its feature FORCES people to re-read the entire post. Some important wording may have been rephrased, and to be 100% sure, you HAVE to re-read it. See how much sense that's making? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
My NOK 0.02. If this sounded harsh or something, then it's because it's SOO annoying to see people make groundless accusations, whine and whine over something that gives more benefits than it does damage. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Revan
Your post has given me my laugh for the day. Given your approach we should rethink the entire concept of the feedback forum. Perhaps you could moderate all the complaints out of it and keep only the form fitting threads. Quote:
With all the efforts it has taken to dissect and comment on each one of those posts or threads, you may have doubled the efforts needed to produce positive suggestions to help make things better. This is the point of this forum is it not? |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Surely you found it easier to read my replies when I quoted the sections of previous posts I was referring to? Hm? Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
|
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information | |
---|---|
|
|
More Information | |
Template Usage:
Phrase Groups Available:
|
Included Files:
Hooks Called:
|