The Arcive of vBulletin Modifications Site. |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why do I no longer have access to this post? Why has it been moved to a secure area?
Quote:
We get into a discussion about *why* it is encryped and *why* there is also an image-call-to-home and it gets closed? wow. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think it was due to the nature of the whole thread beeing basically a huge argument, which are usually avoided on this site. It wouldnt surprise me if this thread gets closed aswell because i expect teh hack author has been contacted by a vb.org staff member about this.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
There wasn't a hint of arugement at all, it was pleasant and simple educated about findings etc. - there as no "JELSOFT IS THE HAXXOR" or any kiddie-flame, which is what bugs me.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I got a PM by one of the vB.org Moderators. What I was told was that the hack has been temporarily removed, until he can get confirmation from Wayne Luke as to whether it breaks the License Agreement or not.
I am awaiting their response and decision. I would have thought that the references I made to Zachery and Scott MacVicar would have covered that - but I guess the moderator wanted to be sure.
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
As best i remember, there was a thread at vB.com in which Wayne told someone how to remove the version call to Jelsoft because the guys forums were behind a firewall and that bit o' traffic was not allowed to pass through.. i can't remember exactly when this happened, but i know i saw it..
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Well, we're back in business! All is well, and it's been formally determined by vB that I didn't violate the EULA. <whew!>
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
congrats, Ocean..
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
so then the call home hack is perfectly fine, correct?
|
![]() |
|
|