Windows Server 2003

[filburt1]

Yesterday at 08:19 AM assassingod said this in Post #15
Linux NEVER crashes for me.

And win98 is the devil

Its evil!

KDE crashed constantly for me. It also trashed my boot record at least twice and my GF dumped me over AIM...on Linux.

[assassingod]

KDE is good for me, pretty stable.

Aw

[NTLDR]

If I have to use Linux then I'd prefer to use Gnome However I think I will allways prefer Windows (NT based versions) to Linux or any other OS.

[VampireMan]

I used to in section #1 just hated windows . Or another way of putting it ..i hated PC's, after a few years i got my first pc & got introduced to the devil aka winblows 95 (floppy disc version).

Then i used a dual boot system.

Now this weekend i moved my trustworthy linux firewall into the hallway after crashing (1 year , 3 months , 2 days uptime).

And created a machine out of spare parts (Amd Duron 800, 512mb SDram. Various Nic's (ISA IBM EtherJet , Sis900 100TX , DEC 490x) , 60gb & 40gb ide dirves (ata100) and a few other spare parts). Got my Beta codes out and downloaded 2003.

It's now been installed for 24 hours, and after a few initial gripes everthing is running perfect. Havnt installed any firewall , apart from using the built in one (not the noob one). Looks nicely built and is compareable to iptables.

Also another note is my internal network is IPV6 based & was easier to setup then most linux systems ive used.

However as with all MS products .. Room for improvement.

[shovel]

Here's some looks into the new Windows Server 2003 from my friend rake's p.o.v.

www.ffdiscovery.com/win.net/

[Razor]

04-26-03 at 12:47 PM filburt1 said this in Post #21
KDE crashed constantly for me. It also trashed my boot record at least twice and my GF dumped me over AIM...on Linux.

KDE rarely crashes for me... a lot less frequently than GNOME. Windows crashes much, much more than both :cry:

I'll take Redhat 9 over Win2K, WinXp, or OS X any day :classic:

[assassingod]

Today at 04:43 PM Razor said this in Post #26
KDE rarely crashes for me... a lot less frequently than GNOME. Windows crashes much, much more than both :cry:

I'll take Redhat 9 over Win2K, WinXp, or OS X any day :classic:

D * I * T * T * O

[NTLDR]

Windows crashes much, much more than both[/B]

Windows XP rarely crashes and if it does its never serious, any flavor of Linux tends to have a wobbly after no time at all.

[shovel]

If your an experienced Unix user than your box should have no problems at all. I still get the blue_screen_of_death every other time I install a program on my XP system.

Professional Windows User; how in the hell do you become that?!

[Razor]

Today at 05:26 PM NTLDR said this in Post #28
Windows XP rarely crashes and if it does its never serious, any flavor of Linux tends to have a wobbly after no time at all.

I ran XP for 3 months on a 1.5 ghz system with 256 megs of ram and it crashed often. I can run Redhat 9 on a much lower system with no problems at all.