sup with the attitude we get from staff here?

[noppid]

Originally Posted by Paul M

Well then clearly we have different views on what "active" is. Would you consider me active if i had not posted since March ? I don't dispute he may have a behind the scenes roll here, but I think moderators should be visible to those they moderate, i.e. activly posting on the site.

I see members quality of membership quantified in participation often here. However, most times, I have no idea what that assessment is based on.

How many hacks do I have to publish for each available vB version to be considered an active contributor?

How many hacks do I have to port to the new version of vB to be considered an active contributor when other hackers leave the community and no longer offer support for broken code?

How many hacks do I have to help new members fix when they do a release and can't fix their own bugs to be considered an active contributor?

How many times after I install a hack, read the code, find a better way to do something, then share it with the author to the entire communities benefit to be considered an active contributor?

How many general vB questions do I have to field to be considered an active contributor?

How many confirmed bugs do I have to report to be considered an active contributor?

Let's find out who we are as members and maybe knowing that we would be less likely to clash with moderators and accuse them of favoritism. A point system would be absolute. Opinions are too subjective.

These guys must be tired of being picked on!

Coming soon...

Quantifing "Commercial"