Based on the poll, it would seem that a majority of people would like the resource. So, at least we can dispense with the arguement that the majority do not want it.
As I said in the other thread, 2 days is not a conclusive amount of time - I am sure there are people for and against it that have not been online in the last two days that would wish to cast their vote...
As I suggested, leave it for a week before you start boogying down over a 4 vote count lead
I think its worth at least a week too however I think its still worth noting that regardless of the outcome from poll, it does obvious that a large % of people (right now, the majority) do want the discussion to change from 'do we' to 'how should we'.
After all, is it supposed to be a '50% or more have to request it in order for it to be taken into consideration' or is it a matter of 'A large portion want something, lets do it'?
Anyhooo - lets see how it pans out however its looking pretty relevant regardless (the lead has been proportionately maintained since it opened). Lets get on with the 'How is the best way to implement it' discussion!
I am wondering about a question for the paid modifications. Is there a way for them to check if the person has a license or not ?
Yes and no. Jelsoft doesn't give anyone access to check a persons licensed status outside of the offical websites. Some of them use a code inserted into a post in code boxes here, but that doesn't stop anyone from leaking it, and you can only change that code so often.
Yes and no. Jelsoft doesn't give anyone access to check a persons licensed status outside of the offical websites. Some of them use a code inserted into a post in code boxes here, but that doesn't stop anyone from leaking it, and you can only change that code so often.
Then how can vbadvanced check if you have a license? (I think it does but I'm not sure)
11-15-2005, 11:04 AM
Linear Mode
