Ban, Ban Lovely Ban

[Kevorkian]

good pool, vote vote :banana:

[Dan]

50-100 but thats when we ++++ed off a member and he kept faking his ip some how and registering over and over.......

[Xenon]

i think in that form the poll is useless.

if you have banned 3 users and your board has just 5 users, it's a lot
if you have banned 1000 but you have 100000 users it's not much...

Today at 03:33 AM Oricon said this in Post #2
50-100 but thats when we ++++ed off a member and he kept faking his ip some how and registering over and over.......

You could IP ban him :dunno: Our tech admin claims this isn't effective, but l'm not there for my technical abilities

Agreeing with Xenon, you also need a zero option dude. There's boards out there that have never banned anyway

Voted in the 1-10 as l think we banned some one to stop them coming back saying they were leaving, and flaming etc.

[Erwin]

You need something between 100-1000.

[Kevorkian]

ups erwin can you add 250, 500 and 750? ^^''

[Tony G]

Around all the times I have been on vB's, around 50..

[filburt1]

At least 50 at WDF. Some trolls but mostly advertisers who don't care to read the bold red text at the WDF registration page saying "no spam." So we move their thread to a special forum, rewrite their links, and immaturely make fun of them. It's a good thing.

[Talisman]

Just thought of this...... We haven't had to ban many individuals (not counting the repeated fake accounts that were used to get back in).

But we have banned several thousand known proxy servers and and a few hundred web-based email domains to minimize anonymous surfers and disposable email accounts. (See Erwin's sig for those.)

I stayed with the low end for my vote. But, technically, speaking we've banned a whole lot more.

[Dean C]

Me none My co-admin does all the social stuff

- miSt