Quote:
Originally Posted by nhawk
This is WAY off topic, but..
I've seen those tests used as an argument against vB4 before, but you can't use that as a test for vB4. That is a test for individual site performance and has nothing to do with vB4 itself.
If it were a test for vB4, my results would be near the same and they aren't.
http://www.webpagetest.org/result/120330_QW_3SJSF/
|
This is after you did ALOT of work to get that type of result.
The other one tested is pretty much out of the box, not alot of work done.
Apples/Oranges and the point is, you HAD to do alot of work on the junk v4 to get decent results.