Go Back   vb.org Archive > Community Central > Community Lounge
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-22-2009, 05:02 AM
DieselMinded's Avatar
DieselMinded DieselMinded is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,655
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default Any Joomla Users?

Im firing up yet another site , its a Portal and will have feeds , news and events from all my sites and ect all in one place , i have decided to install it on a different server and do everything remotely they have a pretty extensive "extensions" section ive been hanging out on and bookmarking all the things that would be of use to me , im curious if anyone here has messed with Joomla any ?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-22-2009, 10:11 AM
AWMGolfer AWMGolfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I have been using joomla for years, looking for any specific information?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-22-2009, 02:11 PM
Winterfell Winterfell is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 22
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I've used it off and on over the years, and I like it well enough. It's much easier to get up and running than Drupal (though I ultimately prefer Drupal in most cases). I'm using it now for my new portfolio site I'm developing. Also, I'm starting to concentrate more of my design work on Joomla, Drupal, and Wordpress, because vBulletin design jobs have been drying up; in part because of the economy, I'm sure, but I think the main reason is vB 4.0 being on the horizon; many are holding off on having a full custom design done until its released.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-22-2009, 03:00 PM
kevcj's Avatar
kevcj kevcj is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: East Texas
Posts: 334
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

About 3 years ago I used joomla for about 6 months. Again in 2008 I used joomla for a few weeks.

My only advice, use Wordpress or Drupal instead.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-22-2009, 06:07 PM
parash parash is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 152
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Joomla is good cms too easy for customization . Only thing you need to be aware of is secutrity ,Some small issues were left behind in all addons be sure the plugins you choose are good and safe to go with . There are mamy groups who usually target on joomla sites ,sql inject them and leave Hacked message .

I have been using it for last 4yrs .
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-22-2009, 06:10 PM
AWMGolfer AWMGolfer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 120
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I'm the opposite, I can't stand Drupal. I use wordpress or joomla, just depending on the project. I tried using joomla when it was on 1.0 a couple years back and really struggled. Once my knowledge of web design increased a bit I went back about 2 years ago or so and haven't looked back since. I love joomla and it's only getting better. I use it to run our school districts website and have helped a few others on some big projects. It does take some time to get it down but if you break it up into pieces it makes it much easier.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-22-2009, 06:15 PM
Winterfell Winterfell is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 22
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by parash View Post
Joomla is good cms too easy for customization . Only thing you need to be aware of is secutrity ,Some small issues were left behind in all addons be sure the plugins you choose are good and safe to go with . There are mamy groups who usually target on joomla sites ,sql inject them and leave Hacked message .

I have been using it for last 4yrs .
Yeah, you have to be on your toes a bit more with Joomla. I once ran a Joomla site that was bridged with a SMF forum, and it was a security nightmare. That won't be so much of a worry with my portfolio site, as it's going to be light on modules and extensions.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-24-2009, 04:42 AM
slinky slinky is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 202
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

1) Drupal is powerful but if you aren't a php developer, have funds, have patience or experience with drupal, it will take you a long time to get up something that looks good and not like stock drupal.

2) Joomla is OK. Looks great, many designs, not impressive from a performance standpoint, can be a hassle to manage content as it gets larger, and is much higher in load than others. Modules are generally plentiful, some good but most are just awkward additions shoved into the software. I find it most useful to use Joomla for smaller corporate type sites where I need something up very quickly that looks very good.

3) Wordpress - if it's simple it works very well. Can be adapted to blogs. Personally my CMS of choice, surprised that I found it to be the best for most uses, at least IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-24-2009, 09:13 AM
VonDoom's Avatar
VonDoom VonDoom is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 494
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Joomlas wrapper Extension is one of my favorite features. I actually really enjoy joomla myself. Its fun to hack and has endless possibility's If your going to bridge a forum i would recommend using Jfusion. http://extensions.joomla.org/extensi...n-bridges/3723
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-24-2009, 10:15 PM
parash parash is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 152
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slinky View Post
1) Drupal is powerful but if you aren't a php developer, have funds, have patience or experience with drupal, it will take you a long time to get up something that looks good and not like stock drupal.

2) Joomla is OK. Looks great, many designs, not impressive from a performance standpoint, can be a hassle to manage content as it gets larger, and is much higher in load than others. Modules are generally plentiful, some good but most are just awkward additions shoved into the software. I find it most useful to use Joomla for smaller corporate type sites where I need something up very quickly that looks very good.

3) Wordpress - if it's simple it works very well. Can be adapted to blogs. Personally my CMS of choice, surprised that I found it to be the best for most uses, at least IMHO.
It's not hard to Manage the contents that depends on one who runs it should know how to Manage it . It takes while to Learn getting used to this CMS . I have been running this cms from 4yrs already and loads of things have been changed contents/traffics of users . Still site is smooth one should know what kind of modules /addons/plugins should be applied to the project they are working on . I know some people randomly choose many plugins to make their site crowd and looking better but less use of plugins/addons could be better idea to handle this cms .

Main thing on this cms will be security managements . Then theres nothing to worry about .
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.04520 seconds
  • Memory Usage 2,253KB
  • Queries Executed 13 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)SHOWTHREAD
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (1)ad_showthread_beforeqr
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost_sig
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost_start
  • (2)bbcode_quote
  • (1)footer
  • (1)forumjump
  • (1)forumrules
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (1)navbar
  • (3)navbar_link
  • (120)option
  • (10)post_thanks_box
  • (10)post_thanks_button
  • (1)post_thanks_javascript
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (10)post_thanks_postbit_info
  • (10)postbit
  • (10)postbit_onlinestatus
  • (10)postbit_wrapper
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open
  • (1)tagbit_wrapper 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • inlinemod
  • postbit
  • posting
  • reputationlevel
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./showthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php
  • ./includes/class_postbit.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_reputation.php
  • ./includes/functions_post_thanks.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_postinfo_query
  • fetch_postinfo
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • showthread_start
  • showthread_getinfo
  • forumjump
  • showthread_post_start
  • showthread_query_postids
  • showthread_query
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • showthread_postbit_create
  • postbit_factory
  • postbit_display_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_end
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_start
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_end
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_start
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_end
  • fetch_musername
  • postbit_imicons
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • postbit_display_complete
  • post_thanks_function_can_thank_this_post_start
  • tag_fetchbit_complete
  • forumrules
  • navbits
  • navbits_complete
  • showthread_complete