Trusted Coder/Designer Scheme for VB.org

[UKBusinessLive]

Its a shame that we can't have a feedback type of mod on here,

Perhaps now's the time to set up a VB.org Trusted Designer/Coder Scheme where only fully vetted and trusted members can join, So no Cowboys, Thanks

It wouldn't take much to set up and only Coders/Designers that are willing to let the scheme mediate any problems before monies are exchanged, Perhaps have a "Trusted Logo" in their Postbit.

Member who want to take part would have to be recommended and provide proof of their work, etc as well as being established on here, Why would someone give a job to a guy no one knows with only 3 post???

It would be a great idea to be able to be part of this scheme, and hopefully members would be proud of their "Trusted" status, Not to mention the influx of work that may come their way.

It does make me angry when people on here get ripped off, but if anyone can prevent it, then its us

I wonder if the Nice Admin's on this great site would allow something like this???

[Shelley_c]

Even being branded as a trusted designer/coder wouldn't be enough to reflect the trustworthiness in a person. Nothing is stopping them from doing a couple of jobs and then ripping off someone. Or, having a friend say they did a great job for them when infact they didn't.

A system needs to be put in place that is ongoing throughout time so people know what kind of person they are dealing with now not from 6 months ago when they were handed a trusted title. I agree though, something needs to be done, too many people are being ripped off here.

[Paul M]

Fully "vetted and trusted" by who exactly ?

What happens if one of these trusted members goes on to "rip someone off" (or is simply accused of it) ?

Sorry, but while at first this may sound a good idea, such a system is open to loads of abuse and problems, and the staff here dont have the time (or desire) to administer such a system (or deal with the numerous complaints, accusations, etc that it would inevitably cause).

[Alfa1]

I think the best that can be done is show how many (un)satisfied customers a coder has, but Paul posted some time ago that a coder rating system will not happen anytime soon.

[UKBusinessLive]

Originally Posted by Paul M

Fully "vetted and trusted" by who exactly ?

What happens if one of these trusted members goes on to "rip someone off" (or is simply accused of it) ?

Sorry, but while at first this may sound a good idea, such a system is open to loads of abuse and problems, and the staff here dont have the time (or desire) to administer such a system (or deal with the numerous complaints, accusations, etc that it would inevitably cause).

Thanks for the reply Paul, Thats the problem "What happens if one of these trusted members goes on to "rip someone off" (or is simply accused of it) ?"

How about some sort of feedback mod where members could see for themselves, I know nothing will stop someone ripping someone off even if they have trusted status, But would a member that has such status be willing to chuck it all away for a few dollars??? ( not to mention future work???)

Most importantly would it lower the rate of these scams being committed, as oppose to simply not doing nothing??

Thanks Paul

[mikey1991]

I can see it turning into more of a competition.

[lasto]

Originally Posted by Alfa1

I think the best that can be done is show how many (un)satisfied customers a coder has, but Paul posted some time ago that a coder rating system will not happen anytime soon.

He may of told us but that dont stop us asking Again does it.
A board is not about the staff please remember that - its about time they stood back and actually listened to what the members are asking for.How many posts/threads have been on here over the yrs regarding the same subject,and how many members have left vb.org simply because its like banging your head off a brick wall,because the staff dont ever want to listen to what others have to say or implement anything that would make the board much safer for ALL members.An ebay feedback system would be the perfect tool.

Who really cares if its open to abuse,its more than we got at the moment,which is nothing.
The current system as it stands is open to abuse and it certainly does get abused simply because there is no comeback on either party if things fall apart.
Final Note : If you not willing to help then you should consider removing the Paid for requests section until you can come up with a better solution.

[UKBusinessLive]

Thats what i thought Lasto, Doing something has to be better that just sitting back and turning the other cheek. Its strange how everyones prepared to argue against an idea like this but when the problems occur, no one wants to know.

The fact remains you can never cure this problem 100% But what you can do is to reduce the risk of re-occurance and thats got to be worth something

[GSeybold]

I belong to another forum that using a rating system for this in which the desinger and buyer rates one another and also leaves a writen eval as well. Similiar to Ebay but not that involved. I won't be using anyone from here again, unless something like this is installed.

It's too bad because I had at least 20 projects or more. Several hundred in award $ I prefer to give my business to individuals who could use a little extra dough, especially now a days, but I guess I'll just go back to use big companies. Bummer.

It's a difficult thing to regulate and takes a lot of admin time I understand this.

Gabby

[smacklan]

Originally Posted by Paul M

Fully "vetted and trusted" by who exactly ?

What happens if one of these trusted members goes on to "rip someone off" (or is simply accused of it) ?

Sorry, but while at first this may sound a good idea, such a system is open to loads of abuse and problems, and the staff here dont have the time (or desire) to administer such a system (or deal with the numerous complaints, accusations, etc that it would inevitably cause).

iTrader is pretty well self-managed and works pretty good at many places I do business Paul. I agree that staff here shouldn't be asked to spend all their time refereeing perhaps something along those lines would be worth a trial period?