The Arcive of Official vBulletin Modifications Site.It is not a VB3 engine, just a parsed copy! |
|
#741
|
||||
|
||||
This post gives some insight to what they did to eliminate locking...
http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/entry...nges-in-vB-4-0 You can read it if you want, but basically it allows changing the table from myISAM to InnoDB so it is no longer table locking but row locking instead (if I understand it correctly). |
#742
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#743
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
One that irks me no end is that if you use Quick Reply, you can't tab once over to a "post" button anymore. When I'm replying to dozens of posts per day, I tend to stick to a keyboard, and I use all of the shortcuts. Having to hop constantly over to a mouse to click one button is a huge oversight IMHO. Most of what I found are minor quirks like that. Having said that, though, I've already found some usable plugins that replace what I have in my 3.x installations. Quote:
The search files themselves are in a new location, from what I can tell, and there are also new tables in the database for search. So, I know it has been somewhat reworked but, like you say, it's still slow, and... Quote:
Beside speed, I've mentioned elsewhere in these forums (even in this thread perhaps?) that I can configure what Sphinx indexes. With MySQL, I'm stuck with whatever is set up in the my.cnf file. I could reconfigure it, but then I'm doing customizations on MySQL for only one application (vB) and possibly hampering the performance of others. With Sphinx, our members are happy simply because they can now search for three-letter terms (where previously, it was four), and I've eliminated a lot of words in the stopwords file so that some common music-based titles can now be searched. I'm actually a bona-fide hero now because members can search for "Who's Next"! Ummm, no thanks. We'd pay a couple hundred bucks, but for something that costs almost what hosting does for a year, and far more than the vB product itself...? We can't justify that, not on our donation-based (and advertising-free) funding. Might be justifiable for forums that are far busier than ours, but we can barely scrape up enough donations to keep going for a year at a time... --------------- Added [DATE]1262887000[/DATE] at [TIME]1262887000[/TIME] --------------- Quote:
In a way, it seems vB searching has taken a step backward. *sigh* We're now back to relying on a built-in search. The main problem is that MySQL just doesn't scale well! Sphinx helps because it bypasses MySQL entirely during the search process. Sphinx isn't that hard to set up, even without root access. |
#744
|
||||
|
||||
Switching to InnoDB is not really a viable option... Can you imagine how many more threads there will be specifically for InnoDB tuning? As if the people whom didn't have a clue about my.cnf before are going to magically make this work... lol.
I spent yesterday installing sphinx (again) on my test server, not sure how it got uninstalled... Anyhow I'm using 0.9.9 (released Dec 2, 09)... I also installed the latest 3.8.x vBulletin.... After looking over the search.php file, it seems there's quite a few hooks available, so I'm going to try and code using those instead of having to edit the search.php file directly. I'm going to code this from scratch rather than try to patchwork more of Orban's code... My question to you guys, what version of vBulletin are you running? For security reasons you can PM me directly if you don't feel comfortable posting in the thread, or you can just say 3.6, 3.7, 3.8, 4.0 and skip the minor version. Also if you could tell me how many threads/posts your forum has that would be helpful too. I'm not 100% sure how I will release this yet (free vs paid)... Once I get closer to a final working product I'll probably ask a couple of you guys to help beta test this for me. I do not plan on even looking at 4.0 for a while... People just have too many negative things to say right now and there are still too many bugs.... |
#745
|
|||
|
|||
Before IB released info on 4.0, they said Sphinx was in the works. Later, when they came out and said "oh, no sorry, no sphinx" I called them out on it and finally got a more concrete answer. From what I've been able to gather, they DO have a Sphinx implementation for 4.0, but they aren't releasing it because they don't consider it finished.
My guess is that they aren't happy with the "search lag" associated with using Delta indexes, and that's why they are holding back. There are realtime updates for Sphinx in the pipeline, but it's not stable yet. Personally, I think it's really stupid that they are probably holding big boards back from upgrading because of the lag between indexes, which is an easy trade off compared to the terrible search performance of the default search. We're running vb 3.6+backported security fixes with ~61 million posts and ~3.1 million threads. Our Sphinx implementation is based around the one from this thread, but I never got around to finishing it so that "Find all posts/threads by user" searches go to Sphinx. I'd love to have that functionality, but I don't really have the time to do it myself. We do a delta index every 5 minutes, and our users are a lot happier than they were years ago using the fulltext search. Granted, the Sphinx search that most of us are using is sort of crappy and doesn't take advantage of boolean operators and all the cool new stuff available in newer versions of Sphinx, but I'll take .5s search results over that stuff any day of the week. Like most of you, we're not touching 4.0 with a 10 foot pole until they've figured out what they are doing and fix all of the performance issues 4.0 has, such as the search, or the hundreds of queries per page on the CMS side of things. As for Searchlight, I like Floren and I think his product is probably great, but I'm not paying that either. Not because I don't have the money, but I just couldn't justify the expenditure with so little information about the product (I realize it's not final yet). Spending 10 times the cost of the vB license for a better search engine? Pass. I'll wait for someone in the community to work out a 4.0 version. Now that the search is full of hooks, you can hook in pre-search-query and return Sphinx results without a bunch of nasty file hacks. It's going to be a lot cleaner than it used to be. I think the only "difficult" part about the whole deal will be setting up Sphinx for people who are cpanel-junkies. As for InnoDB, we've been running InnoDB on a handful tables for probably 5 years now, and don't have many real complaints about it, even with the drawbacks associated with it. |
#746
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
7.7M posts 540k threads Good luck! |
#747
|
||||
|
||||
Thanks for the feedback mute. I would be interested to see what the vB team has come out with thus far (for 4.0) but I doubt they would release the file to anyone.
I've been writing things out and reading over the sphinx documentation with a fine tooth comb. Sphinx DOES support Boolean mode, along with like half a dozen other methods. One thing I plan on doing is offering ALL the features on the vB search page, so no template edit required there to strip things down or remove features... Also I'm going to try and implement the various search modes based on how a user inputs their search criteria... i.e. if they use quotes "This must match exactly" then it will use a phrase search. I have an idea on how to keep near-time up-to-date with the reply #, views, last poster, etc... So that you wouldn't have to wait for your full re-index to update those values. I also need to make note to utilize the "similar threads" search to go to sphinx. I do not know if there is a hook for that (I remember the code is burred somewhere), that *might* require a file edit, or disable similar threads if you want to delete your fulltext indexes. |
#748
|
|||
|
|||
Yeah, what I meant to say is that the Sphinx implementation floating around doesn't support it despite having support in Sphinx. I don't think anyone is going to complain if there are some file edits necessary to have 100% of the vB search functionality replicated on Sphinx. I surely would not
|
#749
|
|||||
|
|||||
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
If it doesn't cripple anything, I would not mind beta testing any new search facilities that crop up here on our 3.x production forum. (Specs below, per your request. ) For the 4.0, since it is private, I'm willing to try anything at this point. The staff doesn't mind helping me out on the user end of things, and they seem to find quirks I can never generate on my own. Our forum: 200,000 threads; 4.6 million posts; 22,000 members. Running vB 3.7.x but looking to upgrade to 3.8.latest since we got the license upgrade several weeks ago. |
#750
|
|||
|
|||
At some point when I actually have a test 4.0 install running with our real dataset, I'm willing to help test as well. Then again, if it works with 1000 posts it's going to work with 60 million, so I'm not really that useful
I would really love an updated version that runs on 3.6 that takes advantage of all the Sphinx goodies, since I don't see us moving to 4.0 for close to a year. All of the custom code we've written has to be ported and tested, and being the lone admin on a site this big has my hands full a lot of the time. |
|
|
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information | |
---|---|
|
|
More Information | |
Template Usage:
Phrase Groups Available:
|
Included Files:
Hooks Called:
|