Social Group and Album Enhancements - All Albums

All Albums 2.5

This hack lets you view an index of all user albums on one page. Looks like a user's index but just has all users instead of just one.

You have to upload the all_albums.php file to your root vBulletin folder. This is the file that you have to access to see all the albums.

ENJOY!

Version 1.1 (03/06/08):

• PHP file only.
• Doesn't show albums that a user can't view.

Version 1.2 (03/09/08):

• PHP file only.
• Fixed Image count if you have vb3.7.0 Beta 6.

Version 2.0 (03/15/08):

• Product MUST be installed now.
• Shows username
• Phrases are normal now.

Version 2.1 (03/19/08):

• PHP file only.
• Fixed Image count if you have vb3.7.0 RC 1.

Version 2.2 (03/21/08):

• Cache Templates
• Fixed some issues with extra queries running.
• Added "Add Album" links.
• album_all_album_list template updated.
• File updated.

Version 2.3 (05/05/08):

• Changed definition of THIS_SCRIPT to all_albums
• Link in navbar is now phrase along with a template.
• all_albums phrase switched to global phrase
• Added all albums link to navbits when on an album page.
• Added who's online location.
• Added sort
• New option: Default Sortfield
• New option: Default Sortorder
• Added link to quick links.
• New option: Show Navbar Link
• New Option: Show Quick-Links Link
• New Option: Show Link in Navbits of Albums

Version 2.4 (10/24/08):

• Added Search

Version 2.5 (10/24/08):

• Added Search text right near search box
• Fixed a prefix bug when using search.
• If a user knows that to put into a URL to do a search, if search is turned off, it will not work.

MAKE SURE YOU CLICK INSTALL!
You will get an email when a new version is released.

[MrToasty]

Originally Posted by Digital Jedi

I know. I don't blame you. But it's just that the forums have been nothing but 4.0 requests for the last couple of months.

I think we all understand this, however if you look back a page you'll see that someone has pretty much successfully ported this modification into 4.0.X with few issues and the only thing stopping them releasing it is questions over ownership of the code. This is why some of us are extra antsy about it's release as a 4.0.X mod..

Frustrating indeed!

[imported_pmay68]

Originally Posted by MrToasty

I think we all understand this, however if you look back a page you'll see that someone has pretty much successfully ported this modification into 4.0.X with few issues and the only thing stopping them releasing it is questions over ownership of the code. This is why some of us are extra antsy about it's release as a 4.0.X mod..

Frustrating indeed!

Yeah what he said!!

[Pixelcarver]

Originally Posted by BBR-APBT

I recoded it for my self.


I don't know if I can or not, I asked abe but I had no answer so far. If he says I can they I will if he does not respond or says no then I can not.

Maybe he is updating this to release I do not know.

Can you tell us what you changed so we can do it ourselves? Kind of like a fix for his mod, I have seen that done before. So you will be given the credit for fixing his code for vb4.

[BBR-APBT]

Originally Posted by Pixelcarver

Can you tell us what you changed so we can do it ourselves? Kind of like a fix for his mod, I have seen that done before. So you will be given the credit for fixing his code for vb4.

No not really there was to many changes I do not even remember what I changed at this point. There would be no way for me to even write directions as there was a bit of code changes some little things some bigger things. I replaced whole templates.

Sorry I couldn't be more helpful.

[Digital Jedi]

You know, there's nothing wrong with posting just the modified files in THIS thread, as long as the coder hasn't said otherwise.

[BBR-APBT]

Originally Posted by Digital Jedi

You know, there's nothing wrong with posting just the modified files in THIS thread, as long as the coder hasn't said otherwise.

It is modified files and templates.

[Lynne]

Originally Posted by Digital Jedi

You know, there's nothing wrong with posting just the modified files in THIS thread, as long as the coder hasn't said otherwise.

Actually, you may not unless the developer says it's OK. Developers don't like people modifying their code and redistributing it without their permission.

[jhabers]

Originally Posted by Lynne

Actually, you may not unless the developer says it's OK. Developers don't like people modifying their code and redistributing it without their permission.

In this case probably close to 90% of the code is stock VB 3.8 code. Most of the custom code is with the templates which BBR-APBT had to rewrite for VB 4, the rest of the "custom" code is SQL queries which I wouldnt classify a SQL query as "custom".

If BBR-APBT were to take his mod, strip out all the VB stock code and then do a 'diff' to Abes code I'm sure only a few lines would match

just my 2cents

[Kolbi]

I guess that?s right too

[kersti]

Can I suggest that the "supported" checkmark is removed if the developer is not actually supporting the product?