Go Back   vb.org Archive > vBulletin Modifications > vBulletin 3.8 Modifications > vBulletin 3.8 Add-ons
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Multiple Account Detection & Prevention Details »»
Multiple Account Detection & Prevention
Version: 1.1.3, by Kiros72 Kiros72 is offline
Developer Last Online: Nov 2023 Show Printable Version Email this Page

Category: Administrative and Maintenance Tools - Version: 3.7.x Rating:
Released: 12-16-2008 Last Update: 03-31-2009 Installs: 1039
Uses Plugins
Additional Files Translations  
No support by the author.

It happens all of the time. Some members will make multiple accounts to back their own opinion or get an extra vote in a poll. Here's a modification that will detect and prevent multiple accounts, as well as notify the administration about multiple accounts. Inspiration for this modification came from the work of MPDev (creator of the Multiple Account Login Detector) and randominity (creator of the Multiple Account Registration Prevention). This is basically a combination of those two modifications but with new and improved functionality.

This is not an update to the "Multiple Account Login Detector (AE Detector)" nor is it an update to the "Multiple Account Registration Prevention." If you have either one of these (or both of them) installed, you should uninstall them before installing this modification.

With the initial release of Multiple Account Detection & Prevention, I believe that I have fixed previous bugs/complications as well as improved the efficiency and logic of the code. This is my first publicly released modification. I would appreciate any comments and suggestions!

Confirmed! This works perfectly on all vBulletin 3.6, 3.7, and 3.8 versions.

Unfortunately, I cannot give support right now. I may be able to help periodically, but until my schedule yields some more free time, I won't be much support. Please check back in a week or two.

Basic Details
File Edits: None
Template Edits: None
New Files: 6
Hooks/Plugins: 3
Global Phrases: 36
Install Time: 2 Minutes or Less
Install Difficulty: None, Very Easy

Features and Settings
- Login Detection
- Registration Prevention (Multiple Methods)
- Ignore Child Accounts
- Ignored Users
- Ignored Usergroups
- Ignored ISPs
- Prevention Usergroup
- IP Address Based Prevention
- Extended IP Address Prevention
- IP Address Time Inclusion
- Banned Account Check
- Primary Banned Usergroup
- Cookie Expiration Time
- Cookie Refreshing
- Cookie Name
- Cookie Reset
- Multiple Account Reporter
- Reports via PM
- PM Report Recipients
- Reports via New Thread
- Forum for Report Threads
- Verbose Mode
- BB Codes: LIST, URL, CODE

How it Works
With every newly recognized login/registration, an account-counting cookie is set (or added onto) with the member's User ID. Depending on the settings, Multiple Account Detection & Prevention will analyze the cookie during login/registration to see if there are any multiple accounts.

Login Detection offers cookie-checking and reporting. Registration Prevention offers the same thing, plus more advanced features. First of all, when it prevents an account from registering, it actually moves the registrant to the Prevention Usergroup so that the administration can review the case. This also allows for customized privileges for recognized multiple registrants. Registration Prevention also has IP address detection which finds out just as much information about users. Depending on an administrator's preference, this modification can also reban a new registrant if one of their previous accounts has been banned. In fact, if the administration wishes, multiple registrants can simply be denied registration all together.

Whenever there is a detection/prevention, the modification will report the information to the administration through private messages, a new thread, or both (depending on settings). The Multiple Account Reporter can be any valid user.

Known Issues
- vB Optimise users: Reporting via thread seems to get messed up by vB Optimise, so try reporting via PM instead.
- PhotoPost vBGallery users: The registration handling appears to not work properly when PhotoPost vBGallery is enabled.

From what I can tell, these known clashes have been caused by the other modification's coding. The author of vB Optimise will not even work with me to fix it. Until they improve their coding, I'm not sure if I can do anything about these issues. As far as I know, administrators that do not use the above modifications will not have any problems.

Installation / Upgrade
Unzip the package (madp.zip), upload the files to your forum location, and import the product file (allow overwrite if upgrading). Please read the ReadMe.txt file that is packaged with the modification for more information.

Please remember to mark this modification as installed if you use it!
If you like it, nominate it for the Mod of the Month!

Thank you!

Download Now

File Type: zip madp.zip (22.3 KB, 4977 views)

Screenshots

File Type: png admincprep.png (62.6 KB, 0 views)
File Type: png admincpop1.png (65.8 KB, 0 views)
File Type: png admincpop2.png (50.6 KB, 0 views)
File Type: png threadregverbose.png (40.3 KB, 0 views)
File Type: png threadloginverbose.png (34.7 KB, 0 views)
File Type: png threadregip_disallow.png (83.3 KB, 0 views)

Show Your Support

  • This modification may not be copied, reproduced or published elsewhere without author's permission.
3 благодарности(ей) от:
aeturner89, Filgga, ricardoNJ

Comments
  #582  
Old 12-24-2011, 09:06 PM
BadgerDog BadgerDog is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 1,789
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Anyone have a fix for this error constantly appearing in our PHP Logs, generated by this mod?

[24-Dec-2011 13:21:08] PHP Parse error: syntax error, unexpected T_VARIABLE in /usr/www/apache/forums/madp/prevention.php on line 308

Thanks ..

Regards,
Doug
Reply With Quote
  #583  
Old 12-29-2011, 06:24 AM
whiteduallyil whiteduallyil is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Thought I would tell you guys that I have tested and this works great on 4.1.9 i love it on my forum that run 3.7.4 and had to try on my new forum and it works.
Reply With Quote
  #584  
Old 01-10-2012, 03:06 AM
NathanLedet NathanLedet is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 85
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

This is working on our 4.x forum - however, I cannot change the name of the cookie away from IDstack. Anything other than that breaks it.

Once i put it back to IDstack, it worked fine.
Reply With Quote
  #585  
Old 01-28-2012, 03:02 PM
fortforum fortforum is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 89
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I´m very sad that the discussion on this mod has died. It´s very very good stuff, so please please make it live again.
Reply With Quote
  #586  
Old 01-28-2012, 03:04 PM
Alfa1's Avatar
Alfa1 Alfa1 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 3,537
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

This should be included to the stock software.
Reply With Quote
  #587  
Old 01-29-2012, 09:27 PM
fortforum fortforum is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 89
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alfa1 View Post
This should be included to the stock software.
For sure. I have tested about a hundred mods on different boards, and this one is just so good. I see people asking for evercookies, but i don?t think those are ethically sound. Who are we to put un-removable stuff on peoples machines?

More features are always welcome, but to me it?s good enough. I have tried to dodge it, and it is ofcourse possible, but it get?s most of them. Why hasn?t this one been up for MOTM? To me it?s a winner.

Very very nice to have on-board, and a big thanx to the Kieros72. Hopfully he will be out of he?s university misery by now. We love you man, please come back.
Reply With Quote
  #588  
Old 01-30-2012, 12:07 AM
Alan_SP's Avatar
Alan_SP Alan_SP is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,122
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fortforum View Post
For sure. I have tested about a hundred mods on different boards, and this one is just so good. I see people asking for evercookies, but i don?t think those are ethically sound. Who are we to put un-removable stuff on peoples machines?
Ethics also depends for what you use evercookies.

If you target people who are known trouble makers (and banned users usually are, at least on my forum) and keep making troubles for all users, why not weed them out with everycookies?
Reply With Quote
  #589  
Old 01-30-2012, 05:46 AM
Alfa1's Avatar
Alfa1 Alfa1 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 3,537
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Yes, thats a good point.

If evercookies are only placed on the computers of banned members, then thats a good function to have.

It needs to be considered that technology is moving forward, more and more people have automatic cookie removal and use dynamic IPs. i.e. it becomes harder to keep banned members out. Even with this awesome addon.
So it would certainly be useful to add more detection methods.
Reply With Quote
  #590  
Old 01-30-2012, 07:56 AM
fortforum fortforum is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 89
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan_SP View Post
Ethics also depends for what you use evercookies.

If you target people who are known trouble makers (and banned users usually are, at least on my forum) and keep making troubles for all users, why not weed them out with everycookies?
I know. But hey, we are running discussion boards, not protecting the CIA db, right?
Reply With Quote
  #591  
Old 01-30-2012, 12:59 PM
DEGE DEGE is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buenos Aires
Posts: 60
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I think that this standard version can be used by whoever wants and another version (with evercookies) can be released parallely for whoever (like me) wants it.

Everyone does what he/she feels right for his/her forum. No one is able to speak for the other since they should be in the other's shoes to do so. So, that said...

When is the evercookie version going to be released? Are you planning so? Do you need some help? Is anybody willing to help?

Regards everybody
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.14717 seconds
  • Memory Usage 2,356KB
  • Queries Executed 26 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)SHOWTHREAD
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (1)ad_showthread_beforeqr
  • (3)bbcode_quote
  • (1)footer
  • (1)forumjump
  • (1)forumrules
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (1)modsystem_post
  • (1)navbar
  • (4)navbar_link
  • (120)option
  • (1)pagenav
  • (1)pagenav_curpage
  • (4)pagenav_pagelink
  • (2)pagenav_pagelinkrel
  • (11)post_thanks_box
  • (3)post_thanks_box_bit
  • (11)post_thanks_button
  • (1)post_thanks_javascript
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (1)post_thanks_postbit
  • (11)post_thanks_postbit_info
  • (10)postbit
  • (7)postbit_attachment
  • (11)postbit_onlinestatus
  • (11)postbit_wrapper
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open
  • (1)tagbit_wrapper 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • inlinemod
  • postbit
  • posting
  • reputationlevel
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./showthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php
  • ./includes/class_postbit.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_reputation.php
  • ./includes/functions_post_thanks.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • showthread_start
  • showthread_getinfo
  • forumjump
  • showthread_post_start
  • showthread_query_postids
  • showthread_query
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • showthread_postbit_create
  • postbit_factory
  • postbit_display_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_end
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_start
  • fetch_musername
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_end
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_start
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_end
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_bit_start
  • post_thanks_function_show_thanks_date_start
  • post_thanks_function_show_thanks_date_end
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_bit_end
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_post_thanks_template_start
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_post_thanks_template_end
  • postbit_imicons
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • postbit_attachment
  • postbit_display_complete
  • post_thanks_function_can_thank_this_post_start
  • pagenav_page
  • pagenav_complete
  • tag_fetchbit_complete
  • forumrules
  • navbits
  • navbits_complete
  • showthread_complete