Go Back   vb.org Archive > Community Central > vBulletin.org Site Feedback
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 01-10-2006, 01:21 PM
Chris M's Avatar
Chris M Chris M is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 6,186
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

This will be the last time I say it; Take the "when is the hack database coming" comments, snipes, questions and answers out of this thread please...

This thread only requires your comment on the current layout of the current 3.0 and 3.5 forum layouts, nothing else...

Also - Regs, please stop trying to push staff into your arguements by badmouthing or criticising us; It won't help your view of the arguement or you any, and will just make us less inclined to listen to what you and the people on your side have to say, since all we get is mostly abuse and criticism from you...

If you want to start up a "Hack database" thread, by all means, go ahead and do it, but stop polluting this and other threads with that same arguement over and over...

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 01-10-2006, 01:40 PM
Regs Regs is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 322
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

The staff is doing quite well pushing themselves into these arguements but whatever.

And Chris M, you brought any "abuse" from me on yourself. I've tried to be helpful in the past and you were an ++++ about it.

Now to the topic at hand... how do you figure that talk of the hack database in this thread is not relevant?!?!?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 01-10-2006, 01:45 PM
EricaJoy EricaJoy is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 236
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Regs
Paddle our bums?
Goodness if that didn't give me the giggles. Way to give me my daily laugh.

Meanwhile, based on the poll, seems 2 out of 3 users like the way the hacks are classified in 3.0. Majority rules?
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 01-10-2006, 01:47 PM
Chris M's Avatar
Chris M Chris M is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 6,186
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Please don't swear...

Secondly I was talking about the Staff as a whole, since you have attacked other staff members in this thread prior to your outburst against me...

Thirdly, regardless of how you view yourself or me, that may not be my take on the situation, or that of others - As far as I remember and can be bothered to look into, you have been trying to cause arguements and trouble for a while now - I simply asked you to stop, but if you choose to continue in this way it will be your problem in the long run...

I figure that talking about the hack database is irrelevant, because once again, this thread is about the difference in forum layout between 3.5 and 3.0 - We could have set up the 3.5 forums the same way as 3.0 but we didn't - The question here is which way do you prefer; It being categorised into plugins, extensions and code mods, or into the "forumhome enhancements" etc 3.0 system...

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 01-10-2006, 02:43 PM
Paul M's Avatar
Paul M Paul M is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 23,748
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony G
And? so what?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony G
Like I said, a few vocal members asking for change won't make it happen. I think it's time you learn things aren't always going to go the way you want them....
Well at least we know how valued our views are now I don't actually recall saying it would go my way (whatever "it" is) but despite your OTT rants, I'm not going to stop voicing my views just because you don't like them.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 01-10-2006, 02:48 PM
Regs Regs is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 322
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Forum enhancements is a more logical choice as it would seem to make more sense for, what I assume to be, the majority of Jelsoft customers - non-coders. With the search feature here not up to snuff, one needs to do the best they can to make the generous offerings here easy to find.

As for swearing, you've got to be kidding me? If you need to go in and edit my post and not let the forums filter do it's job, then you are being extremely selective, don't you think?

For those at home, the word Chris M decided to take issue with is a-r-s-e.

Veiled threats of banning?!?!? Jesus H Christ!
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 01-10-2006, 02:51 PM
Chris M's Avatar
Chris M Chris M is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Northampton, England
Posts: 6,186
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Since not all swear words are blocked out by the incomplete filter, and some people take offence (myself included) to that word, I felt it was appropriate to filter it out manually... It has nothing to do with being selective...

Chris
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 01-10-2006, 02:54 PM
Regs Regs is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 322
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

You're such a fanny-bottom.

Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 01-10-2006, 03:06 PM
Borgs8472 Borgs8472 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 924
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris M
I figure that talking about the hack database is irrelevant, because once again, this thread is about the difference in forum layout between 3.5 and 3.0 - We could have set up the 3.5 forums the same way as 3.0 but we didn't - The question here is which way do you prefer; It being categorised into plugins, extensions and code mods, or into the "forumhome enhancements" etc 3.0 system...

Chris
That would be noble, only:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony G
Anyway, the hack database will soon change the way the 3.5 mod forums are set out but until then it's staying like this. Some people don't want to install mods that change their source files, so this setup isn't exactly useless.
It seems that the structure isn't going to change until the hack database comes. Unless that's not an official statement somehow.

My argument is that the hack database SHOULD be taken out of the equation since it is NOT coming soon. On that basis, 2/3rds of voters so far seem to prefer the 3.0 system.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 01-10-2006, 03:18 PM
Paul M's Avatar
Paul M Paul M is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 23,748
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Unless I'm reading it wrong, the actual vote seems to be 24/11 in favour of the 3.0 system. I prefer hacks classified into what they do, rather than how they do it, which is the 3.0 way.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.04921 seconds
  • Memory Usage 2,261KB
  • Queries Executed 11 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)SHOWTHREAD
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (1)ad_showthread_beforeqr
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost_sig
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost_start
  • (5)bbcode_quote
  • (1)footer
  • (1)forumjump
  • (1)forumrules
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (1)navbar
  • (3)navbar_link
  • (120)option
  • (1)pagenav
  • (1)pagenav_curpage
  • (4)pagenav_pagelink
  • (10)post_thanks_box
  • (10)post_thanks_button
  • (1)post_thanks_javascript
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (10)post_thanks_postbit_info
  • (10)postbit
  • (10)postbit_onlinestatus
  • (10)postbit_wrapper
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open
  • (1)tagbit_wrapper 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • inlinemod
  • postbit
  • posting
  • reputationlevel
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./showthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php
  • ./includes/class_postbit.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_reputation.php
  • ./includes/functions_post_thanks.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • showthread_start
  • showthread_getinfo
  • forumjump
  • showthread_post_start
  • showthread_query_postids
  • showthread_query
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • showthread_postbit_create
  • postbit_factory
  • postbit_display_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_end
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_start
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_end
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_start
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_end
  • fetch_musername
  • postbit_imicons
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • postbit_display_complete
  • post_thanks_function_can_thank_this_post_start
  • pagenav_page
  • pagenav_complete
  • tag_fetchbit_complete
  • forumrules
  • navbits
  • navbits_complete
  • showthread_complete