Yes, because Windows and IE both have such a low crash rate that it's worth paying hundreds of dollars for their software over something that's, you know, free?
Windows is the most unstable widely used OS.. I'm sure that Chrome won't be 100% stable, but I'd be willing to put money on it that it would crash a lot less often than Windows does.
Obviously you don't use Google Chrome very much. lol IE Dosen't hold a candle to the many times the Google Chrome crashes (and that's sad because IE crashes a lot and is FULL of security flaws)
Obviously you don't use Google Chrome very much. lol IE Dosen't hold a candle to the many times the Google Chrome crashes (and that's sad because IE crashes a lot and is FULL of security flaws)
I see two whole security advisories for IE8, terrible rubbish software clearly. Because I hear every other webbrowser on the earth is completely without issue.
I see two whole security advisories for IE8, terrible rubbish software clearly. Because I hear every other webbrowser on the earth is completely without issue.
why so defnsive about IE? You own stock in it or somethin? lol
Shame that this thread has devolved into an argument about web browsers when it isn't even about browsers to begin with. It should be brought back on topic or closed. The topic is not which browser is more secure and crashes the least.
The original question is can Google deliver a viable OS based on their minimalistic browser and whether that OS will pose a viable threat to Windows?
Shame that this thread has devolved into an argument about web browsers when it isn't even about browsers to begin with. It should be brought back on topic or closed. The topic is not which browser is more secure and crashes the least.
The original question is can Google deliver a viable OS based on their minimalistic browser and whether that OS will pose a viable threat to Windows?
your right and I aplogize for my part. Actually I do hope that Google is successful, it would be nice to see some competition for Microsoft.