Version: , by Zachery
Developer Last Online: May 2017
Version: Unknown
Rating:
Released: 11-22-2005
Last Update: Never
Installs: 0
No support by the author.
Basicly, were are nearing the final stages of handing over the project to a group of coders so they will be able to continue the work. We would like to keep area51 open but matthew wants to use his license else where, since hies no longer directly involved. (That means we are sans one vB license for area51).
The uShop code is just about ready for a BETA test, it just needs to be packaged, documented, etc. Which will be the responsability of the new coders.
I will be announcing them over the next few days as we finalize some things.
Show Your Support
This modification may not be copied, reproduced or published elsewhere without author's permission.
I'm a little lost as to what the plan is going to be.
Quote:
It's not that we don't appreciate the offers, we do, it's just that it's preferrable to have one we control.
Who is "we" and what exactly happens to the liscence if three months down the road everyone is to busy and decides to leave the project... is that liscence then lost in limbo? Does a random developer get to take it?
As for beta testing, don't we have a beta testing forum for hacks here where users can download the files and install it and give it a run? I understand that this is a complex hack but I have no issues installing a beta on my live site and providing bug fixes for issues we come across, as well as some new actions for that matter that we are planning to develop.
We could, as suggested earlier in this thread, do the upgrade ourselves from the 3.0 version but if we can't release it for those who need it, then whats the point of doing so and for that matter, why waste the effort in doing the work that someone else already did it?
and what exactly happens to the liscence if three months down the road everyone is to busy and decides to leave the project... is that liscence then lost in limbo? Does a random developer get to take it?
Whoever decides to take over the project.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reeve of shinra
As for beta testing, don't we have a beta testing forum for hacks here where users can download the files and install it and give it a run? I understand that this is a complex hack but I have no issues installing a beta on my live site and providing bug fixes for issues we come across, as well as some new actions for that matter that we are planning to develop.
We could, as suggested earlier in this thread, do the upgrade ourselves from the 3.0 version but if we can't release it for those who need it, then whats the point of doing so and for that matter, why waste the effort in doing the work that someone else already did it?
I said that because I didn't like the at the time rumblings about the delay of this project. I heard people talk big about donating large amounts of money, $200 and more, so far no such donation has been made. As such, there's gonna be a delay for public release.
Not only do we want a public privately owned test board, but we also want a more professional way of reporting and dealing with bugs than threads in a subforum here.
I said that because I didn't like the at the time rumblings about the delay of this project. I heard people talk big about donating large amounts of money, $200 and more, so far no such donation has been made. As such, there's gonna be a delay for public release.
So far, no one I've seen related to this project deserves my donation, it's as simple as that.
So going by that post, is it safe to say then that the obvious errors have been weeded out and the port of this hack is ready to run on vb 3.5 for "phase 2"?
I said that because I didn't like the at the time rumblings about the delay of this project. I heard people talk big about donating large amounts of money, $200 and more, so far no such donation has been made. As such, there's gonna be a delay for public release.
I donated some yesterday and more will come. Worst time of year to ask for donations tho. :P