Go Back   vb.org Archive > vBulletin Modifications > Archive > vB.org Archives > General > Big Board Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools
10k SATA vs 15k SCSI Hard Disks... Details »»
10k SATA vs 15k SCSI Hard Disks...
Version: , by Erwin Erwin is offline
Developer Last Online: May 2013 Show Printable Version Email this Page

Version: Unknown Rating:
Released: 04-11-2006 Last Update: Never Installs: 0
 
No support by the author.

Read this article:
http://www.pugetsystems.com/articles.php?id=19

Interesting... anyone has thoughts?

Show Your Support

  • This modification may not be copied, reproduced or published elsewhere without author's permission.

Comments
  #2  
Old 04-12-2006, 06:14 AM
alexi alexi is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 80
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I think it is moving that way. If you are looking for cutting edge you still go with the SCSI because of the CPU utilization. For anything less you can look at a good SATA system. SATA would certainly be fine for a web front end server.
I wonder how SAS will stack up
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-12-2006, 07:07 AM
Zachery's Avatar
Zachery Zachery is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,440
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I would guess it won't matter much if you are serving tons of dynamic files like php pages as lots of them will be cached. The page was awful blinky for me to read the full article :/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-12-2006, 07:07 AM
Paul M's Avatar
Paul M Paul M is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 23,748
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

That article is over 14 months old - a lifetime in disk technology so i wonder how they compare now. Our (work) experience is that SATA still lags SCSI - certainly in SAN arrays.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-12-2006, 06:02 PM
FlyBoy73 FlyBoy73 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 297
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I scanned over the article to the end results so I may have missed something. I did a lot of research before having my new 2x 270 Opteron server custom made with 15k SAS drives, RAID 1 & RAID 10 drive arrays, etc. I had a lot of people telling me to go with the Raptor 10k SATA drives because they were "just as fast" as SCSI but after a lot of research that just isn't true in a heavy data base environment. SCSI or SAS drives have a lot better I/O than SATA.

I would be willing to use fast SATA drives for future web servers but for my database server I won't use anything but SCSI or SAS.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-12-2006, 09:51 PM
Erwin's Avatar
Erwin Erwin is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,604
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I plan to use 4 x SATA disks in RAID 0 - that should be plenty fast.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-12-2006, 09:59 PM
FlyBoy73 FlyBoy73 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 297
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Erwin,
Are you using this for data base or web? How many servers are you running now?

David
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-13-2006, 12:45 AM
Zachery's Avatar
Zachery Zachery is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,440
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erwin
I plan to use 4 x SATA disks in RAID 0 - that should be plenty fast.
Its not so much speed, as having the the onboard cpu just for the scsi drives to do lookups. Which is why scsi is, and always has been faster.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-13-2006, 06:36 AM
kerplunknet kerplunknet is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 50
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

No doubt 15,000 RPM SCSI hard drives are faster than 10,000 RPM Serial ATA hard drives. I have both kinds and there is really no comparison... especially when comparing large file transfers.

All I have to say about hard drives is:

RAID RAID RAID RAID

RAID-10 = The way to go for anything (if you can afford it).
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-13-2006, 07:29 AM
Erwin's Avatar
Erwin Erwin is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,604
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

If you had to choose between the following for a VERY BUSY DATABASE SERVER, which would you choose?

1. 10k Raptor SATA vs 10k SCSI?

2. 10k Raptor SATA (2) RAID 1 vs 10k SCSI?

3. 10k Raptor SATA (4) RAID 1 vs 10k SCSI?

I'm trying to decide how essential SCSI is for a busy db server.

Also, choose between the following:

4. Dual Processor/ Dual Core Opteron 2.0 4 Gb with 10k Raptor SATA (2) RAID 0 (or RAID 1)

vs

Dual Xeon 2.8 (single cores) 3 Gb with 10k SCSI (no Raid)

for a busy database server???

Is SCSI so much better that it overrides the CPU advantage? Does RAID makes SATA better than SCSI?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.04273 seconds
  • Memory Usage 2,283KB
  • Queries Executed 23 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)SHOWTHREAD
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (1)ad_showthread_beforeqr
  • (1)bbcode_quote
  • (1)footer
  • (1)forumjump
  • (1)forumrules
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (1)modsystem_post
  • (1)navbar
  • (6)navbar_link
  • (120)option
  • (1)pagenav
  • (1)pagenav_curpage
  • (2)pagenav_pagelink
  • (10)post_thanks_box
  • (10)post_thanks_button
  • (1)post_thanks_javascript
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (10)post_thanks_postbit_info
  • (9)postbit
  • (10)postbit_onlinestatus
  • (10)postbit_wrapper
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open
  • (1)tagbit_wrapper 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • inlinemod
  • postbit
  • posting
  • reputationlevel
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./showthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php
  • ./includes/class_postbit.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_reputation.php
  • ./includes/functions_post_thanks.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • showthread_start
  • showthread_getinfo
  • forumjump
  • showthread_post_start
  • showthread_query_postids
  • showthread_query
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • showthread_postbit_create
  • postbit_factory
  • postbit_display_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_end
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_start
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_end
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_start
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_end
  • fetch_musername
  • postbit_imicons
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • postbit_display_complete
  • post_thanks_function_can_thank_this_post_start
  • pagenav_page
  • pagenav_complete
  • tag_fetchbit_complete
  • forumrules
  • navbits
  • navbits_complete
  • showthread_complete