What is the point?

[Ohiosweetheart]

Originally Posted by noppid

Don't make me pull this car over!

you want to, you know you do

[Boofo]

Cheater!

[Ohiosweetheart]

now now... I haven't given up on you yet...

[Boofo]

Originally Posted by Ohiosweetheart

now now... I haven't given up on you yet...

I hope not, because I am soooooo lonely now.

[Lottis]

Not all hacks works with 3.6.0
Not-vbadvance
Not- Plaza
And one more, but i havent figure out witch one makes a conflict.

[Boofo]

Originally Posted by Lottis

Not all hacks works with 3.6.0
Not-vbadvance
Not- Plaza
And one more, but i havent figure out witch one makes a conflict.

I don't use either one of those so I am 2 for 0 so far. Let's hope the one other you have it another one I don't use.

[kira]

Originally Posted by Ohiosweetheart

ohhh judging me by my website? tsk tsk
Just as you have your opinion, I have mine. I'm not the one who turned this into another "us against them" discussion... that was done before I posted here.

Actually, no. You're the one who turned the thread into an us v. them discussion by having your hissy fit about people "complaining about every little thing."

I notice that you are allowed to complain about the graphics & styles area a few threads below, because after all, it's important to you and thus fair game. But others' complaints? Nope, not allowed, they're just +++++ing and moaning about "every little thing."

FWIW, I don't have a problem with the new 3.6 boards, since I think it's possible that new hacks may work with 3.6 but not 3.5. But for those who do have issues, I think it's valuable to hear their opinions, especially since no one here was doing so in an unhelpful or insulting manner.

We're all admins here, most of us anyway. Site Feedback is for the positives and negatives. If the negatives are currently outweighing the positives, well, that's just part of the usual cycle. Any smart admin worth the title will listen to ALL complaints, not just those from an annointed few. Some may be baseless, sure. That's not for us to decide. It's all part of the gig.

[Ohiosweetheart]

Originally Posted by kira

Actually, no. You're the one who turned the thread into an us v. them discussion by having your hissy fit about people "complaining about every little thing."

I notice that you are allowed to complain about the graphics & styles area a few threads below, because after all, it's important to you and thus fair game. But others' complaints? Nope, not allowed, they're just +++++ing and moaning about "every little thing."

FWIW, I don't have a problem with the new 3.6 boards, since I think it's possible that new hacks may work with 3.6 but not 3.5. But for those who do have issues, I think it's valuable to hear their opinions, especially since no one here was doing so in an unhelpful or insulting manner.

We're all admins here, most of us anyway. Site Feedback is for the positives and negatives. If the negatives are currently outweighing the positives, well, that's just part of the usual cycle. Any smart admin worth the title will listen to ALL complaints, not just those from an annointed few. Some may be baseless, sure. That's not for us to decide. It's all part of the gig.

I happen to agree with you on most points.

As for the graphics section, I have backed up one lady about the graphics section in all of what... maybe 4 posts? 5 at the most. That's hardly the same thing. And FYI... all of this site is important to me, not just the graphics section. I'm an admin like most here are, so ONE section wouldn't be more important to me than another.
It just seems like every single thing that the staff does here is in the line of fire lately. New members are coming in, reading these threads and saying WTH is going on here? Some have even posted their views on what they see. Have you read them?
My post was hardly a "hissy fit"... it was my opinion.. posted and over with. Just as your post is your opinion. Have a nice day

[Mosh]

I agree with the party saying that modifications that have been release for 3.5.x and work with 3.6 (without modification) should NOT be posted in the 3.6 forums.

It is just duplicating the same work to get extra Installs, which in my opinion is low and make a mockery of the Coders/Designers promotion system, as I assume it is an automated system and probably can not tell that the same code has been posted twice in two different places.

Coders/Designers should just put a notice in their 3.5.x modifications to say that it works with 3.6 or like hornstar1337 and Dean C said we could have a [v3.5.x/3.6] version selection in vB version when editing a modification.

I think only modifications that have had to be altered for 3.6 should be allowed in the 3.6 forums, and the rest should be removed for fairness to the other coders/designers who have not gone down that route that certain coders/designers have.

I will be doing the same once I have tested my modifications with v3.6, if they work without alteration then I will either state that is the case or use the appropriate vB version selection if it available.

Just my 2c worth to this discussion.

[davidw]

Please, people, lets try to keep this on subject and civil.