Originally posted by FireFly We won't accept re-posted hacks or someone's hack that is posted by someone else. (i.e hacker B takes a hack by hacker A, and post it as his own)
Ok I voted option 2 and again think it should be judged by days registered rather than posts. I don't post that heavily mainly because[list=1][*]I search for the answer before I post an error which 98% of the time means I don't have to post a question since it's been answered already.[*]I don't spend alot of time just hanging out due to work (wish I could I like this place and the people)[*]I tend to only post if I have something useful to add.[/list=1]
Originally posted by qwaz So that's what I'm saying. You're going to be judging the quality of the code, I hope you have the manpower.
No, where have you read that? You must be reading my posts and backwards. If hacker B releases a different version of an existing hack there is no reason not to accept it. Whether it's better or worse, that's up to you to decide.
Yes. It would cut down on the clutter that resides in most of the replies. The "yea this is cool", "check my site I installed" and other nonsense that currenty populates most of the threads.
Each thread for a hack should serve as support for the hack and anything else should be moderated out. I read the forum everyday, even though I don't have any hacks installed, and for every useful post there are 3 others that do nothing but take up space.
Originally posted by FireFly We won't accept re-posted hacks or someone's hack that is posted by someone else. (i.e hacker B takes a hack by hacker A, and post it as his own)
04-10-2002, 12:53 PM
![wooolF[RM]'s Avatar](customavatars/avatar4816_0.gif){kind=avatar}
![wooolF[RM] is offline](images/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
(wish I could I like this place and the people)[*]I tend to only post if I have something useful to add.[/list=1]
Linear Mode
