Version: 2.1, by superjeff
Developer Last Online: May 2010
Category: Major Additions -
Version: 3.7.x
Rating:
Released: 03-20-2008
Last Update: 03-18-2009
Installs: 633
DB Changes Uses Plugins Auto-Templates
Code Changes Additional Files Translations
No support by the author.
TfSEO 2.1
TfSEO is a powerful and free url rewrite for the vBulletin system: it rewrite forum, thread and post urls.
For me it's very hard to explain well all the feature of this plugin, soo the best way is test it.
How much does it weight on the server?
I have tested on my home server:
TfSEO enabled, heavy:
Code:
[root@hserver ~]# ab -n 100 http://hserver/tfseo_1/main-forum-f2/dsadas-t4
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev <$Revision: 1.146 $> apache-2.0
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
Benchmarking hserver (be patient).....done
Server Software: Apache/2.2.3
Server Hostname: hserver
Server Port: 80
Document Path: /tfseo_1/main-forum-f2/dsadas-t4
Document Length: 33804 bytes
Concurrency Level: 1
Time taken for tests: 22.177687 seconds
Complete requests: 100
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 3420400 bytes
HTML transferred: 3380400 bytes
Requests per second: 4.51 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 221.777 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 221.777 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 150.60 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0
Processing: 220 221 0.7 221 223
Waiting: 209 210 0.8 210 213
Total: 220 221 0.7 221 223
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 221
66% 221
75% 222
80% 222
90% 222
95% 222
98% 223
99% 223
100% 223 (longest request)
TfSEO disabled, standart vburl:
Code:
[root@hserver ~]# ab -n 100 http://hserver/tfseo_1/showthread.php?p=4#post4
This is ApacheBench, Version 2.0.40-dev <$Revision: 1.146 $> apache-2.0
Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/
Copyright 2006 The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/
Benchmarking hserver (be patient).....done
Server Software: Apache/2.2.3
Server Hostname: hserver
Server Port: 80
Document Path: /tfseo_1/showthread.php?p=4#post4
Document Length: 34010 bytes
Concurrency Level: 1
Time taken for tests: 21.870820 seconds
Complete requests: 100
Failed requests: 0
Write errors: 0
Total transferred: 3441000 bytes
HTML transferred: 3401000 bytes
Requests per second: 4.57 [#/sec] (mean)
Time per request: 218.708 [ms] (mean)
Time per request: 218.708 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests)
Transfer rate: 153.63 [Kbytes/sec] received
Connection Times (ms)
min mean[+/-sd] median max
Connect: 0 0 0.0 0 0
Processing: 216 218 0.9 218 220
Waiting: 205 207 0.9 208 209
Total: 216 218 0.9 218 220
WARNING: The median and mean for the waiting time are not within a normal deviat ion
These results are probably not that reliable.
Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms)
50% 218
66% 218
75% 219
80% 219
90% 219
95% 219
98% 220
99% 220
100% 220 (longest request)
Like you can see product takes about +10ms per request.
Note: vbulletin will have by default a rewrite system from version 4.0 (beta should coming next month, april). I relly suggest you to wait, and not use this product. If the vb's rewrite will be great, i will no more update this product.
I think that will be useful if you add an option to filter some words that are irrelevant for SEO purposes, I mean short words that Google and other search engines don't have in account when you make a search, words like: "to", "the", "of", and so on.
AFAIK these type of words aren't relevant. Is this really true?
And just in case that you add this option... it will have as a implicance a higher CPU load?
The Previous/Next links do not seem to work. Are you going to release a plugin for vbadvanced cmps? Many users would find it useful.
Thanks for the mod, superjeff.
The Previous/Next don't work because they have the "nofollow" attribute and a rewite of its will add two query every time you display a thread! The plugin for vbadvanced cmps is incoming.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jscieza
I think that will be useful if you add an option to filter some words that are irrelevant for SEO purposes, I mean short words that Google and other search engines don't have in account when you make a search, words like: "to", "the", "of", and so on.
AFAIK these type of words aren't relevant. Is this really true?
And just in case that you add this option... it will have as a implicance a higher CPU load?
Thank you!
This option is incoming, but below the vbadvanced plugin
It will no have implicance in a higher CPU load.
I would suggest anyone holds off from this. Will this coder support this in the next version? If not, you're going have to uninstall -- meaning you lose ranking and indexed pages as they will have to be re-indexed.
When you have chance please upgrade your plugin in your live demo forum so visitors of this plugin will see it in action with the fixes that you're including with the new releases.
It would be nice if you put a change log of your mod.
How already some members said you, if possible make an effort to code your mod in english. vBulletin.org's hack programmers speak english and many of they don't understand italian... so it will be a bit hard for you to get help in case of problems where you need a hand.
I like this mod. Just waiting for the requested option and I will install it! Hope it will not take much time to be implemented :up:
Read first of write. Have you read the "introduction"?
I have no just add it, you can check with the google cache.
Many users have said they will support their hacks for a long time; do many stick with it? NO! I am not disrespecting you or your hack; it is a good hack, but if you did stop support it and not heard of again -- then people would have problems.
I'm going to add all these suggest, but it will take me much time.
Quote:
*Installed
Thank you
Quote:
Many users have said they will support their hacks for a long time; do many stick with it? NO! I am not disrespecting you or your hack; it is a good hack, but if you did stop support it and not heard of again -- then people would have problems.
If this plugin will dead tomorrow, you can buy a license of NuSEO or VbSEO ad customize the url-rewrite setting. You will not lose any serp. (or you can set by .htaccess a 301 rewite to standarts urls)