Go Back   vb.org Archive > vBulletin Modifications > Archive > vB.org Archives > General > Big Board Discussions
Reload this Page How many of you are running 64 bit servers?
FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
Page 2 of 5 1 2 34 Last »
 
Thread Tools
How many of you are running 64 bit servers? Details »»
How many of you are running 64 bit servers?
Version: , by FlyBoy73 FlyBoy73 is offline
Developer Last Online: Jul 2014 Show Printable Version Email this Page
Version: Unknown Rating:
Released: 04-18-2006 Last Update: Never Installs: 0
 
No support by the author.

How many of you with leased dedicated or colo dedicated servers are running 64 Bit System? I don't mean that you have 64 bit processors... I mean that you are running 64 Bit Linux.

If you are running 64 Bit.. Have you seen any speed increases that you can attribute to moving to 64 bits and more importantly... have you had any headaches or problems with your 64 bit system?

Show Your Support

  • This modification may not be copied, reproduced or published elsewhere without author's permission.

Comments
  #12  
Old 04-19-2006, 09:48 PM
Erwin's Avatar
Erwin Erwin is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,604
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
The problem with Fedora is its short lifespan of a few months vs a few years for the others.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-19-2006, 09:49 PM
Erwin's Avatar
Erwin Erwin is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,604
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
Anyone using Debian with a 64bit kernel?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-21-2006, 12:18 AM
Erwin's Avatar
Erwin Erwin is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,604
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
FWIW, I've decided to go with FreeBSD for my new servers.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-21-2006, 01:45 AM
kerplunknet kerplunknet is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 50
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erwin
The problem with Fedora is its short lifespan of a few months vs a few years for the others.
It is very, very easy to upgrade from older versions of Fedora. It's pretty much:

rpm -ivh fedora-new-release-here.rpm

yum upgrade

Reboot the server and done!


I have had bad experience with CentOS, for the record.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erwin
FWIW, I've decided to go with FreeBSD for my new servers.
FreeBSD is a VERY good choice if you know how to administer it.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-21-2006, 03:00 AM
Erwin's Avatar
Erwin Erwin is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,604
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
I'm a RH7.3-9, Fedora Core 1, RHEL2and3 kinda guy myself. FreeBSD will be new, but it looks robust and upgrades using the port system looks enticing! Part of the potential issue with Fedora is that it has the impression of being a test OS for commercial RHEL, and as such, is bleeding edge and may be unstable/unsecure.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-21-2006, 05:26 AM
dan35's Avatar
dan35 dan35 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: California
Posts: 158
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
yeah, FreeBSD rulezzz
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-25-2006, 08:15 AM
TiKi XB TiKi XB is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 5
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erwin
Anyone using Debian with a 64bit kernel?
Yes for a while but I stepped back to K7 after it caused me too many headaches such as certain apps requiring cross compile environment etc.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-25-2006, 01:16 PM
scottct1 scottct1 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 391
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erwin
FWIW, I've decided to go with FreeBSD for my new servers.
Erwin, what version of FreeBSD are you going to use? I want to use FreeBSD 6 (64 bit) with Cpanel, however Cpanel says FreeBSD 4 64 bit is the latest they support.

I NEED Cpanel.

I am currently running CentOS 64 bit without issues and am trying to figure out which way to go when I buy a new box next week.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-25-2006, 06:15 PM
FlyBoy73 FlyBoy73 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Texas, USA
Posts: 297
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
I am running CentOS 4.1 w/ WHM/cPanel in 64 bit without a problem so far. I know my server manager did some tweaking but he said they have been running / managing 64 bit servers with cPanel now for a few months without any problems. I'm guessing they have resolved the issues themselves since a lot of people have been having bad experiences with 64bit and cPanel
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-25-2006, 06:49 PM
BrentW BrentW is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 36
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
Athlon 64 / Fedora
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 2 of 5 1 2 34 Last »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:47 AM.

Contact Us - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.05176 seconds
  • Memory Usage 2,292KB
  • Queries Executed 25 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)SHOWTHREAD
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (1)ad_showthread_beforeqr
  • (4)bbcode_quote
  • (1)footer
  • (1)forumjump
  • (1)forumrules
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (1)modsystem_post
  • (1)navbar
  • (6)navbar_link
  • (120)option
  • (1)pagenav
  • (1)pagenav_curpage
  • (3)pagenav_pagelink
  • (11)post_thanks_box
  • (11)post_thanks_button
  • (1)post_thanks_javascript
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (11)post_thanks_postbit_info
  • (10)postbit
  • (11)postbit_onlinestatus
  • (11)postbit_wrapper
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open
  • (1)tagbit_wrapper 
Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • inlinemod
  • postbit
  • posting
  • reputationlevel
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./showthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php
  • ./includes/class_postbit.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_reputation.php
  • ./includes/functions_post_thanks.php 
Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • showthread_start
  • showthread_getinfo
  • forumjump
  • showthread_post_start
  • showthread_query_postids
  • showthread_query
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • showthread_postbit_create
  • postbit_factory
  • postbit_display_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_end
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_start
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_end
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_start
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_end
  • fetch_musername
  • postbit_imicons
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • postbit_display_complete
  • post_thanks_function_can_thank_this_post_start
  • pagenav_page
  • pagenav_complete
  • tag_fetchbit_complete
  • forumrules
  • navbits
  • navbits_complete
  • showthread_complete