Great product would be good is ghost users not used disapeared
Nominated
This will probably come in 1.6.
Thanks!
--- OT ---
By the way, I do not think this merits a version update, but the original post has been cleaned up and edited to be much more readable. I was using colors like it was a coloring book and it may have made reading the instructions cumbersome.
Doing something like this would require client-side code (to catch clicks via JavaScript, etc.) that could be exploited. Then, we would have to include a JS framework. The overhead of doing something like this is simply not worth it. The only thing that can be done is the pruning of the ghost users that are stale (orders started 2 or more weeks ago and never fulfilled). I will include this in a future update, maybe 1.5 or 1.6. Ghost users do not show up in the member list or statistics I believe.
1.4 has just been released by the way.
Gotya! but if you could add a cleanup function as you say anything over 2 weeks or something would be great, and btw they do count as stats.
Users have been reporting the following, this only occurs in Chrome and Firefox, not IE.
When a user logins in via chrome and firefox, they enter the user name and password, get the thank-you for logging in screen, then they are redirected to the VBCMS, but when they arrive at the VBCMS, they show as not logged in.
If however, from the VBCMS, the hit the forums tab, on the forum they show as logged in, then if they select the home page, they will also show as logged in.
The problem also occurs in the following situation :
Repeat scenario above, exit browser, when they return to the when site, they still show as not logged in, but when they select the forums tab, they are now logged in?
I tested this myself and can attest that the above scenario is true.
This modification does not interact with the log-in system at all and nothing in the user creation process can cause this after registration. There is a problem somewhere, but it is not with this modification.
I'm confused; what's wrong with the current email verification system?
I meant, if choosing Free it requires you to verify address before you proceed any further i.e. you see none of the registration process (nada, zip, zilch not even checking to see if a username can be used or not etc) past the subscription page if your email is not verified first, if going paid route then proceed as designed because it's paid of course.
I meant, if choosing Free it requires you to verify address before you proceed any further i.e. you see none of the registration process (nada, zip, zilch not even checking to see if a username can be used or not etc) past the subscription page if your email is not verified first, if going paid route then proceed as designed because it's paid of course.
Pay to Register Details »»
About Developer
Visit Web Site
Uses Plugins 
No support by the author.
05-29-2011, 03:27 PM
