Is this allowed?

[Bubble #5]

Originally Posted by Billspaintball

since the actual code of the hack is a unique work it is covered under copywrite laws

That all depends on how that code is initially presented as reflected in the Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service case. All of the data in Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service was also unique but it was ruled that it trumped the copyright law

[Billspaintball]

Originally Posted by Boofo

Damn! There goes my Bills PayPal hack down the drain.

Dont worry,
remember were all listing you in the credits now to save us support later

Originally Posted by Bubble #5

That all depends on how that code is initially presented as reflected in the Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service case. All of the data in Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service was also unique but it was ruled that it trumped the copyright law

Your talking about something very different to what we are discussing here.
All that happened there was copying publicly available information from someone elses public listings.
Its not relevant to using someone elses unique code at all.

See here for more detail on this case.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feist_P...ephone_Service

[Boofo]

Originally Posted by Billspaintball

Dont worry,
remember were all listing you in the credits now to save us support later

Damn! I knew there was a catch.

[Billspaintball]

Die Auto merge, Die...