Any possible security breaches/backdoors should be made known to the users really - now you've got a bunch of people worried, A) that there are real risks in using vb.org and its hacks and B) there's no way to find out which hacks are actually being questioned.
This is another reason why I think Jelsoft needs to employ someone to overlook things here, because ultimately whatever goes on at vb.org affects Jelsoft directly.
Why doesn't Jelsoft employ a staff member or two to look over these issues? I reckon they could go through all the hacks once submitted and approve them if they looked ok along with having enough time to run and support this site.
Or why not build a team of coders willing to look over code and seeing whether a hack should be approved or not? No hacks going 'live' without approval, and any changes to uploaded files having to be approved too. Jelsoft could pay them for their time.
If vBulletin was open-source this may be understandable, but it's not - it has enough resources to employ staff in these missing areas.
|
05-27-2006, 03:19 PM
Hybrid Mode
