I think some people are getting a little paranoid here, it's not about being "anti-American", it's about the day to day life of Joe Public being private, and items of news that are no longer relevant being brought to the for by technology, which a matter of a few years back would be lost in the annals of time.
Personally I think the question this raises more than any other, is not what the court is ruling, but how often does Google update the popularity of a search string.
The case being is that, if his is not the only article cropping up when searching for his name, why are more recent articles lower down the pages, logic would suggest that they are being searched more than something from 1998.
|