Go Back   vb.org Archive > vBulletin 4 Discussion > vB4 General Discussions
  #21  
Old 01-20-2011, 12:16 AM
Idawg's Avatar
Idawg Idawg is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Phx, Az
Posts: 65
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I installed my first 4.0 forum in Feb 2010, and upgraded my 2 biz sites in April. The install of 4 went well, BUT the upgrades crashed BOTH sites, to the point I had to install my current backups 2x before it finally ran. And the mods had not caught up yet, and I had to leave a lot of the mods out. I was and still am VERY disappointed in the upgrade system.

I would recommend a fresh install, but be VERY wary of upgrades from 3.8 to 4.x.x
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 01-20-2011, 12:31 AM
conradk conradk is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 37
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I should say, that I've only a couple of times gotten over 100 active users at one time. So who knows if it scales the same. But I'm finding 4.0.8 is about as fast and stable as 3.8.x was. And I have a chatbox + sidebar + gallery-what's new on the forum home. Page loads are not generally a problem though I've turned off some 4.x features to speed things up on the forum index - but I didn't really need those anyways. (Should say here that vB3.x was equally inefficient in displaying 'who's on')

Had to turn off Facebook Connect, but that was due to the hang loading the fb logo and fb bots - not a vB problem. Had to restrict Guest access due to bots following all links and causing SQL cpu usage to spike. I'm lucky in that the bloated (due to post/thread cache) file size of the db is not an issue with the hosting provider.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 01-26-2011, 08:20 AM
SamirDarji SamirDarji is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 645
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Great feedback guys! I've been sticking with the vb3 platform and will probably continue to do so. I think with the evolution going on in the world of communities, I may drop a forum format completely and go with something else if I can find a product and a company that will back it properly.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-07-2011, 07:51 PM
RedWingFan's Avatar
RedWingFan RedWingFan is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canton, MI USA
Posts: 103
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaqoneal View Post
When vBulletin 4 came out back in December '09, there were a lot of compliants of how it's not as good as vBulletin 3.8. Well, it's been over a year now.


In your opinion, is vBulletin 3.8 still better than vBulletin 4?
Bought the 4.x license just to keep updated with the 3.7/3.8 series. Set up a test 4.x forum--the moderators don't like it, and the test users didn't like the sluggishness. As the site admin and developer, I don't like the code bloat. And with no native Sphinx support, and a lack of time to dink around with trying to get Sphinx working on 4.x, It's a definite pass.

Short version: "No." vB4 is the last time we buy a license.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-08-2011, 06:12 PM
Joey805 Joey805 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 119
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

So what happens now that they have stopped allowing maintenance renewals for VB3? Once that expires, we can no longer receive patches and security updates. We are basically FORCED to goto VB4. I did a test upgrade yesterday from VB3.8 and it did not go well. A bunch of errors but I worked through it. I have the test forum up and running now but I do notices freezes and hangs which my VB3.8 forum does not experience. Overall, it just performs slower. I've also run into a few random bugs within the admincp as well.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-08-2011, 06:14 PM
Brandon Sheley's Avatar
Brandon Sheley Brandon Sheley is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Google Kansas
Posts: 4,678
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

vBulletin 4 works fine for me, if it didn't than I wouldn't of upgraded..

No one is FORCED to do anything.. You always have options
Those that say that, are just looking to argue in my experience
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-08-2011, 06:18 PM
misuse misuse is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: San Diego, CA USA
Posts: 30
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I have been running a dev server since it came out. So far I see no reason to upgrade from 3.8.
The skinning/styling is near impossible for an intermediate user let alone a company that is one of the best template designers in the VB world. They have had their hands tied with template design since before the gold versions came out.

The ad spots are very limited! For those of us that make a living off our sites the spots and ability to ad new spots (there is none) makes VB4 a definate NO UPGRADE.

I feel like IB took over and wants everyone's sites to not make $ and all look the same. It would mean less customer support issues.

It seems now that they are trying to force us to upgrade. Great....

I want to use the new tech but not at the cost of losing $ and dealing with managing nightmares.

I have 3 dedicated servers running my site. My host said they would not support VB4 if upgraded to. Too buggy for them, this was yesterday!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-08-2011, 06:26 PM
Joey805 Joey805 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 119
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by misuse View Post
I have been running a dev server since it came out. So far I see no reason to upgrade from 3.8.
The skinning/styling is near impossible for an intermediate user let alone a company that is one of the best template designers in the VB world. They have had their hands tied with template design since before the gold versions came out.

The ad spots are very limited! For those of us that make a living off our sites the spots and ability to ad new spots (there is none) makes VB4 a definate NO UPGRADE.

I feel like IB took over and wants everyone's sites to not make $ and all look the same. It would mean less customer support issues.

It seems now that they are trying to force us to upgrade. Great....


I agree 100%
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-08-2011, 07:51 PM
Chase Chase is offline
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Northern Ohio
Posts: 237
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

I've gone back and forth probably 100 times whether or not I want to upgrade to 4.1.2. Right now I'm on 3.8.4, very happy with it, at the very least I would upgrade to 3.8.7.

I set up a test forum for 4.1.2 and here are some things I've noticed.

- Page load lags... seems to take a little longer to load normal pages, doesn't seem as fluid as 3.x... I am on a semi-dedicated server so it can't be that.

- Editing styles can be very challenging... this could especially be true for new owners with no experience. vB took away the simplicity and made things harder to customize, of course IMO. What drew me to vbulletin 9 years ago was the simplicity of the software... not to bash the developers, but I don't think they took us into consideration. Not everyone is an expert in design and customization.

- Adding tabs or nav links aren't as easy. Shouldn't this be a rather simple procedure? I don't want to deal with crazy conditions.

- And like many others have already stated, it seems like 4.x is more bloated than 3.x.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-08-2011, 08:07 PM
Boofo's Avatar
Boofo Boofo is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Des Moines, IA (USA)
Posts: 15,776
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chase View Post
- Page load lags... seems to take a little longer to load normal pages, doesn't seem as fluid as 3.x... I am on a semi-dedicated server so it can't be that.
I agree. But you also have to remember how much more is going on in vb 4 than in vb 3.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chase View Post
- Editing styles can be very challenging... this could especially be true for new owners with no experience. vB took away the simplicity and made things harder to customize, of course IMO. What drew me to vbulletin 9 years ago was the simplicity of the software... not to bash the developers, but I don't think they took us into consideration. Not everyone is an expert in design and customization.
Yes and no. CSS is always the best way to go for most things. The only drawback is that there are some things you still cannot do via CSS that you can do with tables.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chase View Post
- Adding tabs or nav links aren't as easy. Shouldn't this be a rather simple procedure? I don't want to deal with crazy conditions.
Once you do it, it is not as daunting as you think. It gets easier.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chase View Post
- And like many others have already stated, it seems like 4.x is more bloated than 3.x.
True, again. But, as I said above, there is more going on in vb 4.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.08330 seconds
  • Memory Usage 2,264KB
  • Queries Executed 13 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)SHOWTHREAD
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (1)ad_showthread_beforeqr
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost_sig
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost_start
  • (6)bbcode_quote
  • (1)footer
  • (1)forumjump
  • (1)forumrules
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (1)navbar
  • (3)navbar_link
  • (120)option
  • (1)pagenav
  • (1)pagenav_curpage
  • (4)pagenav_pagelink
  • (10)post_thanks_box
  • (10)post_thanks_button
  • (1)post_thanks_javascript
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (10)post_thanks_postbit_info
  • (10)postbit
  • (10)postbit_onlinestatus
  • (10)postbit_wrapper
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open
  • (1)tagbit_wrapper 

Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • inlinemod
  • postbit
  • posting
  • reputationlevel
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./showthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php
  • ./includes/class_postbit.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_reputation.php
  • ./includes/functions_post_thanks.php 

Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_postinfo_query
  • fetch_postinfo
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • showthread_start
  • showthread_getinfo
  • forumjump
  • showthread_post_start
  • showthread_query_postids
  • showthread_query
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • showthread_postbit_create
  • postbit_factory
  • postbit_display_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_end
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_start
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_end
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_start
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_end
  • fetch_musername
  • postbit_imicons
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • postbit_display_complete
  • post_thanks_function_can_thank_this_post_start
  • pagenav_page
  • pagenav_complete
  • tag_fetchbit_complete
  • forumrules
  • navbits
  • navbits_complete
  • showthread_complete