Quote:
Originally Posted by Floris
That is utter nonsense, because I am completely free to vote for whoever I want, for whatever reason. You can't make me vote at all, or tell me that there are rules preventing you to vote for the underdog.
If you guys find it perfectly fine that one author is listed 5 out of 5 times, in this case 3 out of 5, so be it. Not going to bother with that, not my site, not my rules.
But saying I can not vote for whatever reason I want, as unfair, you sir, are out of line.
Plus, your math is wrong, but that's ok.
Let's vote for the new president: obama, obama, obama, obama, christopher walken .. you're not allowed to vote for the underdog .. Which seems to be your math.
But hey: enjoy your winnings vsa, it's a guarantee! You already have 78 votes out of the 118 votes. You can take that to the bank.
|
It doesn't matter how many votes HE has, just how many his individual MODS have.
For instance, Coder a could have 4 out of the 5 mods, and get 750 of the 1000 votes cast for their mods.
However, if all of those mods get 190 or so votes each, and the 5th guys mod gets 250, person B wins.
Therfore having multiple mods nominated doesn't guarantee a win. It could be that the votes that would have went to you if only 1 of your mods is nominated, instead get split BETWEEN your mods, and someone else wins =)
Also, I believe Paul called your vote unfair because it had nothing to do with how good the mods were, instead you just voted for the person who created it...
Which, unless i'm mistaken, is what you're complaining about o.O
03-07-2010, 04:55 PM
Hybrid Mode
