If he was working at Wal-mart than 95% of his salary should go to advocacy against animal cruelty. That should be his only purpose in life right now and should have been part of his original sentence. And yes, if Wal-mart hired him and used it for publicity than I wouldn't shop there anymore or anywhere else for that matter. He can actually make a decent living in advocacy work and it would improve his image. I am not saying his entire life but for 5 years.
If he was simply caught at a dog fight, than he more than served his time. However he funded them and killed animals violently because "they didn't perform to expectations". I bet he doesn't have to worry about being electrocuted or drowned if he doesn't perform up to expectations.
|
08-17-2009, 10:33 PM
Hybrid Mode
