New signature rule

[Corriewf]

Originally Posted by Biker_GA

Technically, no it isn't if it gathers information.

If you look at MarcoH64's sig ---

Look at the rule again, it says image. Look at his post count, the mods are fully aware of his sig.

Originally Posted by Tony G

Okay, both of you, calm down.

I imagine that many members would find dynamic PHP sigs annoying, I am one of them. I dislike image sigs alltogether as I see them as a waste of my download limits, not to mention they lag threads and make them load slower for everyone.

Fast Board > Pointless image sigs.

Dont get mad at me cause yoda got owned.... :squareeyed:

Originally Posted by dndog

I couldn't help but notice the new signature rule that does not allow dynamic php image signatures (being very popular among vB users).

Any particular reason for this? :ermm:

The bottom line is that this is a forum of courtesy not of right. None of the primary staff here make any money nor profit from our purchases of vbulletin. With that being said, they can make the rules and don't owe any explanation in doing so. It is nice when they do, but its not required. This particular topic has become redundant.