Should it be Hacker or Hack of the Month?

[s.molinari]

Don't mean to be a party pooper, but shouldn't the hacks be nominated and not the hackers. This gives you alot more room for nominations and I believe more interest in the voting over the long run. Plus, it gives those who wrote just a couple (or one) hacks a chance at getting some fame.

Who's going to be nominated next month? All the same names again? They are the cream of the crop. I can see it now. Firefly will win this month. Kier, Tubedogg, or Ed Sullivan will win the next and so on.

Sure, they deserve the credit but it's the hack that should be nominated and not the hacker. When the hack wins the hacker gets the credit automatically. Quality is what we're looking for.

Scott

p.s. I noticed your using my vBcode and smilie user interface improvement. Thanx, a great honor.
I think it would have had a chance at winning hack of the month. See what I mean.