The Arcive of Official vBulletin Modifications Site.It is not a VB3 engine, just a parsed copy! |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe I should start up a thread about the dangers of intolerance, as that essentially is why MC is allowed to continue. Every time with you religious people I am polite and respect your opinions and try and see your point of view, yet you always reply in a way that is rude and completely dismisses my point of view. You don't even try and see it from my point of view. That is why I will never see you or your religions as having any legitimacy. I'm tired of being tolerant of intolerance.
As if to add insult to injury I just found this article by an Indonesian paper, that talks about MC as if it is a legitimate cure, I didn't realize Indonesia was doing the same thing to the poor people of their occupied Papua province. Having this happen so close to Australia, and have it happen to some of the most vulnerable men in the world really makes me realize how inhumane this practice is. All they are doing is taking advantage of the most vulnerable in our society to make a quick buck. If you want an example of what happens when you let these religious people rule Indonesia is a classic textbook case. Also note the Clintons foundation is also supporting this. I thought the Clintons would know better than this. What upsets me most is how the article describes what is a barbaric stone age process so clinically and without any emotion, and passes it off as a legitimate medical practice. I thought people were smarter than this, obviously I was wrong. Quote:
Here is an example of how the MC argument usually goes on TV, juxtaposed against the facts. Medical professionals will make blanket statements and use emotion instead of reason when approaching this topic; just like the religious people do. If Doctors are even perpetuating these lies then you know something is wrong. Anyone who supports MC has a hidden interest, be it money, from the surgical procedure or devices used to facilitate MC, selling of the foreskin, or to promote their religious views. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-Lm396q8KA --------------- Added [DATE]1436019418[/DATE] at [TIME]1436019418[/TIME] --------------- Also remember this only came to my attention because of the case happening with the 4 year old boy in the US called Chase. You can find out more about him here and the 'phony phimosis' argument used to justify his MC: http://www.phillyvoice.com/mother-re...-circumcision/ It seems everything to do with MC comes from a lack of proper education of the parents when dealing with these things, especially when dealing with how to care for a infants penis and that you do not retract the skin, that is something you let the boy do once he is able to and once the foreskin separates from the penis. I only hope this thread may help future parents come to a more informed choice. If your still on the fence about MC, these pictures show the risks involved, and please be aware the link contains graphic surgical images, some showing how infection has caused a lot of the skin around the babies abdomen to be removed. Also note in the surgical video, no anaesthesia is used, as the baby gets more agitated once the surgery begins: http://www.drmomma.org/2010/05/the-p...cumcision.html Anyway the only reason I became aware of this issue was because I saw it on the news with the court case about the mother who went to jail because she didn't want her boy circumcised, and if anyone ends up finding out what happens to Chase please update us here. |
Благодарность от: | ||
RichieBoy67 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information | |
---|---|
|
|
![]() |
|
Template Usage:
Phrase Groups Available:
|
Included Files:
Hooks Called:
|