The Arcive of Official vBulletin Modifications Site.It is not a VB3 engine, just a parsed copy! |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
It is short sighted and you assume too much. None of his modifications are free. Now as for his vision..it does not take into account numerous years of complaints and requests by members of this community. It doesn't even note the information in this thread. I was willing to pay him and the reality of it is he doesn't need your defense because he wasn't insulted. The viewpoint is hardly enlightened in front of the facts and it needs pointing out.
Regardless of what the style was intended to do it falls far short. IT IS NOT ADEQUATE for a supported release in this day and age. Only a technocrat thinks its functional and "good to go". The majority of forum users are laymen...They don't know markup or BB code. They don't even know that BB Code exists so that makes replying to threads a frustrating experience. They want basic functionality such as updating their profiles and reading private messaging. Also a wise technician does not say what users should do. A wise technician does what users want... This is the main reason that xenforo and other forum softwares has risen and loads of customers, including cpanel and digital point, have left vbulletin. There is a arrogance in the way things are run and built. The majority are mobile users and will remain so. End of story. A wise business gives people what they want. Its called supply and demand. There is high demand but no supply. |
#32
|
||||
|
||||
No defense intended. Just making a point that most developers know when a platform has run its coarse and know when to stop development on said platform.
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
There are lots of legacy users out there. More on vb4 than on vb3.X and vb4 is still supported officially... A responsive mobile skin for vb4 would be profitable (with no competition) and it would extend the life of vBulletin. People are jumping ship to other brands... That's a sad thing. |
#34
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to change someone's mind, patronizing him is not a good start...
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
You know, I can quote dictionaries, too, if you need help with context (note: this is just an example for patronizing speech). Merriam-Webster, in this case.
Quote:
|
#37
|
||||
|
||||
No mam... absolutely not. Your definition is entirely incorrect. It wasn't condescending...it was a registration of facts.
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
Oh, come on. Even the page you copied your definition from gives you this:
Quote:
And of course your posts are condescending, and as you can see in this thread, I'm not the only one who thinks so. Anyway, you may just play games with yourself, now. |
#39
|
||||
|
||||
this wont work on 4.2.2 ?
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
And unlike the $500 no-name site (linked in one of the earlier posts), you're somebody that many of us already know. We respect and enjoy working with you. You've always done excellent work for reasonable rates. I was relieved to find this post just now, as we now have a theme option from a quality coder. Too many "responsive vBulletin themes" have been outright coding abortions. |
|
|
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information | |
---|---|
|
|
More Information | |
Template Usage:
Phrase Groups Available:
|
Included Files:
Hooks Called:
|