Go Back   vb.org Archive > Community Discussions > Forum and Server Management
Reload this Page Keeping with Fedora, worth it?
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-04-2008, 07:37 AM
ssslippy ssslippy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 877
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default Keeping with Fedora, worth it?
Our current situation is we have fedra 6 running on our server.
We also run the latest version of plesk.

The issue is there is no php-dist for fedora 6 with php 5.2.x so we cant build from source anything for php. Example is we went to install xcache and had to build from source and just cant.

Should we upgrade to fedora 7, cant go to 8 as plesk doesnt work on 8, or switch to another OS completly.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-04-2008, 07:46 AM
royo royo is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 80
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
CentOS 4 or 5 should be more suited for an environment running Plesk.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-05-2008, 08:43 AM
SEOvB's Avatar
SEOvB SEOvB is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 2,451
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
I second the CentOS recommendation
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-05-2008, 09:28 AM
Dismounted's Avatar
Dismounted Dismounted is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 15,047
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
We run CentOS 5, and it hasn't been giving us any problems.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-05-2008, 09:59 AM
Paul M's Avatar
Paul M Paul M is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 23,748
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
I run plesk 8.3 on fedora 4 without any issues.

You can get php 5.2.5 for any fedora/plesk from Atomic Turtle (using YUM).

I build xcache from source on them (and also on a fed6 box we had).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-13-2008, 06:59 AM
TECK's Avatar
TECK TECK is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,182
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssslippy View Post
Our current situation is we have fedra 6 running on our server.
We also run the latest version of plesk.

The issue is there is no php-dist for fedora 6 with php 5.2.x so we cant build from source anything for php. Example is we went to install xcache and had to build from source and just cant.

Should we upgrade to fedora 7, cant go to 8 as plesk doesnt work on 8, or switch to another OS completly.
Do you really need to open your server to hackers, by using Plesk and it's known SQL Inject issues? Take it off, all those "gadgets" are worthless on a server environment. You are playing russian rulette by allowing a cheap PHP interface to control your server at any level. There is nothing wrong using ONLY the terminal to achieve the same results... in a VERY secure way.
I would dump Fedora and use CentOS or Debian. Although Debian is known for it's slow upgrades, so if you are the bleeding edge type, stick with CentOS 5.1. That's what I use in all my servers. Fedora is not a real server piece of software but more a desktop OS. Even there, Ubuntu will kick Fedora's ass big time.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-22-2008, 01:46 PM
wolfstream wolfstream is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 382
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
If you must use a control panel, use one that keeps itself up to date (cpanel / directadmin) and allows for SOURCE compilation of php, not silly rpms.

Also, move away from fedora, it's a 'test bed' for redhat. If you're happy with bugs and whatnot in your OS, then stay there. Otherwise, CentOS is a much more stable option for hosting.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-22-2008, 03:25 PM
TECK's Avatar
TECK TECK is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,182
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
I think RPMs are way better then a direct compile. They allow you to test your build, before you actually put any software on your server. I build my own RPMs for anything I install into my servers. Believe it or not, there are many mistakes you can find into public builds.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-22-2008, 03:33 PM
wolfstream wolfstream is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 382
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
And redhat refuses to keep up with updates in packages, which forces individuals to use source.

For many, rpms are fine, but for vulnerable applications, rpms are not fine.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-22-2008, 03:39 PM
TECK's Avatar
TECK TECK is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,182
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили: 0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
Default
You are right, related to RHEL updates. That's why I started to build my own RPM's a long time ago.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:01 PM.

Contact Us - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.12 by vBS
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information
  • Page Generation 0.06449 seconds
  • Memory Usage 2,255KB
  • Queries Executed 13 (?)
More Information
Template Usage:
  • (1)SHOWTHREAD
  • (1)ad_footer_end
  • (1)ad_footer_start
  • (1)ad_header_end
  • (1)ad_header_logo
  • (1)ad_navbar_below
  • (1)ad_showthread_beforeqr
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost_sig
  • (1)ad_showthread_firstpost_start
  • (1)bbcode_quote
  • (1)footer
  • (1)forumjump
  • (1)forumrules
  • (1)gobutton
  • (1)header
  • (1)headinclude
  • (1)navbar
  • (3)navbar_link
  • (120)option
  • (1)pagenav
  • (1)pagenav_curpage
  • (1)pagenav_pagelink
  • (10)post_thanks_box
  • (10)post_thanks_button
  • (1)post_thanks_javascript
  • (1)post_thanks_navbar_search
  • (10)post_thanks_postbit_info
  • (10)postbit
  • (10)postbit_onlinestatus
  • (10)postbit_wrapper
  • (1)spacer_close
  • (1)spacer_open
  • (1)tagbit_wrapper 
Phrase Groups Available:
  • global
  • inlinemod
  • postbit
  • posting
  • reputationlevel
  • showthread
Included Files:
  • ./showthread.php
  • ./global.php
  • ./includes/init.php
  • ./includes/class_core.php
  • ./includes/config.php
  • ./includes/functions.php
  • ./includes/class_hook.php
  • ./includes/modsystem_functions.php
  • ./includes/functions_bigthree.php
  • ./includes/class_postbit.php
  • ./includes/class_bbcode.php
  • ./includes/functions_reputation.php
  • ./includes/functions_post_thanks.php 
Hooks Called:
  • init_startup
  • init_startup_session_setup_start
  • init_startup_session_setup_complete
  • cache_permissions
  • fetch_postinfo_query
  • fetch_postinfo
  • fetch_threadinfo_query
  • fetch_threadinfo
  • fetch_foruminfo
  • style_fetch
  • cache_templates
  • global_start
  • parse_templates
  • global_setup_complete
  • showthread_start
  • showthread_getinfo
  • forumjump
  • showthread_post_start
  • showthread_query_postids
  • showthread_query
  • bbcode_fetch_tags
  • bbcode_create
  • showthread_postbit_create
  • postbit_factory
  • postbit_display_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_start
  • post_thanks_function_post_thanks_off_end
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_start
  • post_thanks_function_fetch_thanks_end
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_start
  • post_thanks_function_thanked_already_end
  • fetch_musername
  • postbit_imicons
  • bbcode_parse_start
  • bbcode_parse_complete_precache
  • bbcode_parse_complete
  • postbit_display_complete
  • post_thanks_function_can_thank_this_post_start
  • pagenav_page
  • pagenav_complete
  • tag_fetchbit_complete
  • forumrules
  • navbits
  • navbits_complete
  • showthread_complete