The Arcive of Official vBulletin Modifications Site.It is not a VB3 engine, just a parsed copy! |
|
#181
|
||||
|
||||
I already "came forward" as you say and told you things are being put into place to prevent things like this from happening in the future. It dsoesn't matter how that will happen, as long as it does, right? 'Nuff said.
|
#182
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
You own us that much, but if you don't see it that we, its indicative of a far greater problem. |
#183
|
||||
|
||||
Read post 167 in this thread and it will explain it all to you better than I ever could.
|
#184
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
some pretty hard straight talking |
#185
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
We will do whatever we can to prevent such problems in the future, yes, hence a reason for the increas of staff members, but in the last run, you are the only one responsible for any code you apply to YOUR board. |
#186
|
||||
|
||||
FASherman, there IS a procedure in place for security risks. Code that is found to have them (through our discovery or user reports) goes through a process by which users are warned and the mod is removed if necessary.
But, this is a peer coding community. Ideally, anybody who installs the mods here has reviewed the code before installing it on their forum. It is not a commercial download site where the code is vetted by the company. Huge difference in concepts. If any CYA stuff needs to be done on the part of Jelsoft, I suppose a huge click through disclaimer when you register here would work. |
#187
|
|||
|
|||
Before everything becomes a total fight over nothing it would be great if we were able to try bridge that gap, where an even greater level of trust can be established in the service that vB.org provides.
Most persons know that it is the users' responsibility for what is put on their forums, however would it not be possible in the future for vB.org to attach a stamp of approval to the code that has been checked, so that the level of trust can be increased. This is not about blame but simply more an effort to feel safe within vB.org So, if you download a hack and it doesn't 'yet' have the 'stamp of approval' then the user knows it is at their own peril Something like this would be appreciated Thanks C |
#188
|
||||
|
||||
At clayton: yeah, a good system, which we already working on
just give use a bit time, not everything can be made over one night ^^ |
#189
|
||||
|
||||
Just to clarify a couple of other points - someone mentioned it being around for months - the auto install code referred to only existed for 4 weeks - also, it never actually touched peoples forums, it made a simple GET request from your browser to the install link at vb.org.
|
#190
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
well since you let the cat out of the bag :surprised: yeah i did see it in your Display who has read a thread - Version 3 product... but then it was removed in the next update... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
X vBulletin 3.8.12 by vBS Debug Information | |
---|---|
|
|
More Information | |
Template Usage:
Phrase Groups Available:
|
Included Files:
Hooks Called:
|