It is a very good idea.
But it also has been suggested (members and within Staff) many times before, and it was in some way even implemented once (not as far as really putting verified or not).
It always failed because there are no volunteers that want to go through all the submitted code (and every time an update is done). This is not only a huge task, but what if you verify a source, and later to find out you missed some nasty code somewhere, are you/we liable?
There are many aspects to this, but maybe it is the right time now to give it another try.
|