[tgreer]

Originally Posted by amykhar

It wasn't Paul's code that triggered it. The reported mods list didn't contain Paul's mods. They were discovered and added later when the matter was being researched. Now, feel free to call me a liar if you will, but the original mdb file of offending mods didn't have a single Paul mod on it.

And, staff didn't name Paul in this thread. He posted and askied if his code was covered under that policy. And, he was told that it is.

Whether it was or wasn't (the catalyst) isn't the issue. The manner in which the staff answers such questions, is. If it was his code, say so. If it wasn't, say so. But 2 paragraphs of high-toned rhetoric that is dismissive of the question as "not relevant" doesn't answer the question.

As the staff meets to discuss ways to improve the site and research/resolve the causes of the recent tension, I'd hope that "Staff Responses/Professionalism" be on the agenda, with this thread being a case-in-point.

I don't have much more to say, so will back quietly away from this discussion now.