Quote:
Originally Posted by Michelle
Quote:
Originally Posted by vissa
IDEA 1: I've modified some ratings systems (like for photos) so that, for example, if there are more than 3 votes the lowest scored vote gets dropped (or the highest, etc). Or the lowest score gets a boost of one point. So if you have a user with 25 votes and 4.99 score (because of one bad vote) they rank higher than a user with 2 votes at 5.0. This could be customizable somehow.
|
Very nice, but can you think of an algorithm for that?
|
I've done it before -- I will look it up, though I'm not sure if it will plug right into your code.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michelle
Quote:
Originally Posted by vissa
IDEA 2: The effects/weight of a karma vote could be modified by the voting member's stats in some way (like number of posts, registration date, their karma, etc). This would be a little more like the rep system, but not really because it is always an average with one vote per person. This would be a big change but would be a lot more accurate of "true karma."
|
Nah, I don't agree with this. It's not fair. For instance, how would you feel if in the elections your vote counted less than the president's?
|
True it wouldn't be fair if it was an election (and I agree with you in principle), but then you don't have as much voting fraud (hopefully) in a real election. On a forum, certain user's opinions do count more IMHO. If votes couldn't be weighted differently, how about only allowing certain usergroups to vote (or is that already possible?). That way you can keep your newbies from voting (but still allow them to be rated). I'm concerned about people registering multiple accounts just to vote for themselves. If the newbie usergroup wasn't allowed to vote, that would probably prevent it.
Thanks
-vissa