[nitro]

Originally Posted by Corriewf

Yeah and let me know about the class action you are probably working on for someone not warning you that coffee is served hot.

Goodluck finding a lawyer or a court to handle your case.. There is no slander in his post. He stated the facts from his end without name calling.




Also you should be familiar with the above TOS that all member here agreed to.

Your anaology to some other pathetic case of which I have no involvement in where as you have suggested I may have is riduclous.

With regards the TOS quote, as vb.org staff have allready participated in the thread, means it is without doubt the subject has been reviewed by them, therefore it only leaves a question in civil law as to wether the post itself is objectionable and the disclaimer is good enough in the sense to counter a continued publication of a possible prematurely slanderous post and is therefore an objectionable post.

As the TOS states they will endevour to remove objectionable posts by members, and the fact that they have participated in the thread and left it open to public veiwing and response, thereby possibly failing to act as per their own TOS impo has left them wide open to a contraversal and potentially succesful suit.

The TOS in this instance has not been adhered to, wether that be how civil law would see it is another story. How ever from what I see all that needs to be done here is prove the post is slanderous and therefore objectionable, the rest is par for the course.