Quote:
Originally posted by fastforward
I don't understand how the message with an order of 2 was a direct reply to the parent. If this were the case, it would have an order of 1. This 'ord' field is simply a count of references in the header. The other unlikely scenario is that the news server added two references (but as you pointed out, there was only one ref in each message). I will check the code, but as I'm sure you've seen, not a lot can go wrong with counting how many refs are in the header. Somewhere between the count and the insertion into the usenet_article table it must have lost one of the refs.
|
I looked more closely at the actual messages on the newsgroup server and message 3 was a reply to message 2, however, it had no refs in the header. So an order of 2 is correct, but the orphaned replies code only found one reference to associate with it.