[The Geek]

@Boofo Fair enough, I agree that regardless of the outcome, there will be those that will be upset over the decision. The goal however should be on a solution that works for the majority while respecting the needs and requirements of the minority.

While you claim the majority don't want it here, I would disagree and say that my perception is that most are indifferent to it, many think it would be positive and some would hate it. Therefore .orgs process is catering to those few that dig their heels in about it. I do not see an overwhelming amount of people on either side of the fence coming into this thread voicing strong opinions either way. Regardless, I see more coders supporting a move than more coders against it (unless I am wrong you are the only one that has released modifications strongly opposed to it). Taking that into account I feel that its important to give a little more weight to those putting in the work creating, maintaining and supporting over those that just reap the benefits. I am not saying its because they are better people, just that without those doing the work, the others have little to gain.

Maybe put forward a poll?
1- Are you greatly opposed to .org providing information on commercial vb enhancements?
2- Do you think it would be a positive addition to .org to provide information on commercial vb enhancements?
3- I'm not bothered either way.

The only caution I would provide in regards to the above poll is the natural weight of the givers and receivers. Keep in mind that only a tiny % of those on this site actually contribute.

If I were to conduct a poll on my site about 'would you like to see content added to the site however you would have to pay to see those additions?' some would be realistic with 'Sure, if I want it, ill buy it' while many would simply say 'no, give it to us for free' (Especially if I had a vocal moderator who had already made his mind up about it before it had even been discussed )

On a side not: I don't think coders are special, I don't think users are bad. There are people in both camps that are bad - and both have needs but that isn't and shouldn't be the issue anymore. It should be focused on what will move .org forward to become a better resource for Jelsoft customers.

And I apologize for my off hand 'weakest and angriest' comment. It was OTT and irresponsible of me.