[CyberRanger]

Originally Posted by Paul M

I might be more useful if you actually created a second prefix (TABLE_PREFIX_USERS) and used this, rather than removing the prefix - most people use a prefix for a reason.

Yes, absolutely. You may have noticed that in my "find and replace" commands I didn't totally remove TABLE_PREFIX. Instead, where the code reads " . TABLE_PREFIX . ", I replaced that with "." One could easily substitute anything else where the dot is between the quotes. Also, if you need to go back and replace TABLE_PREFIX, you could do a "find-replace" on say ["."user] replace with [". SHARED_TABLE_PREFIX . "user].