[sabret00the]

Originally Posted by Revan

Quote me the post where we have mentioned money, please

I dont know about DV but I don't venture there much because I can rarely code off the top of my head, so it would be too much testing and hassle.
See the next point of this post.
Do you think we were going to hound them day and night, never giving them rest until they comply? Wrong. We would simply notify the coder and warn the end-user. If this discourages the coder, then that coder is a carebear and really should toughen up if he wants to survive in life. Constructive critisism is the core of all learning.

how does it sit right with you that you're willing to say "you're code is ++++, fix it" but you're not willing to say "oh to do that, try this" come on, if any system like the one you're backing was put into place, i'd suggest that all 'validators' had a record or helping needy coders before they even thought about validating code.

and while you're not saying you're hounding em, didn't i read up above that you'd like to filter out un-standardized code and even possibly disallow un-standardised code? if that's not hounding people i don't know what is.

funny thing about this thread is, that i've spent most of my time the past couple weeks on a literature peer review system lol.