Quote:
Originally Posted by Zachery
vB3 was faster for me, less nested tables, less overall code in the page, external css file support. 10x faster, rendering times should be down as well
|
"less" code in the page doesn't mean anything.. they're just stored eleswhere for retrival...
vb3 is slower than vb2 in terms of page rendering.. there is hardly any JS code in vb2 whereas vb3 is bloated with JS which tend to lag browsers and cause delays. the PHP code might be more "optimized" in vb3, but it doesn't mean its any faster than vb2 when it comes to page rendering.
i dont think i have plans on upgrading to vb3.5. just thinking about all the bloated "AJAX" JS code it will have makes me look the other way. I took vb3 and basically rewrote and eliminated almost all the excessive JS code.