
12-15-2004, 12:57 PM
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 157
Благодарил(а): 0 раз(а)
Поблагодарили:
0 раз(а) в 0 сообщениях
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RS25com
Here's a problem I noticed.
I have a user who had some bad deals, so he got some negative feedback. However, he also had some good deals as well. The problem is that he had more good than bad deals, so he still has a +2 rating. If people don't look at his rating in detail, they may think he's good to go and purchase from him, even though he may be committing fraud.
The solution would be to change the way the ratings are calculated. Instead of just +1 or -1, it would be smarter to do it like eBay does - 100% less any negative marks. In this case, he might have 4 good and 2 bad. Instead of having a +2 rating, he would have a 66% rating, where everyone else would have 100%.
How hard would it be to change the way this hack does the math? I would be very interested in seeing it like this.
Besides, people are used to how eBay works, so this would make a lot more sense to more people.
|
The percentage certainly seems more informative. I'd prefer it. :thumbsup
|