wcbryant, I understand what you're trying to do, but I don't think this hack serves the purpose. (unless my interpretation is wrong, and mudpyr8 is closer to your question)
Quote:
One control that might be necessary is the ability to prohibit the use of a particular code in a signature. BBCodes are normally allowed in signatures, but someone who puts [power] into their sig, or [roll]50d1000[/roll] could generate a lot of server activity. If this isn't possible, the admin will just have to watch for such sigs, but it is important to note that. 100 people with factorials in their sigs is gonna be bad.
|
In the case you have a server-extensive function, it would. If you have the feature for not calling a function every time upon page refresh (although there is a bug right now where you must post in the WYSIWYG editor for this to apply) then it wouldn't be that big of a deal.
I will look into disabling it for signatures, as well fixing that bug, over the weekend.