[ManagerJosh]

Originally Posted by Miratos

Speed pointed out that was a weak clause here:
https://vborg.vbsupport.ru/showpost....&postcount=118

I also do not think that encompasses the ability to retroactively change the license agreement.

Anytime a LA changes, the end user still has to accept it...as evidenced by paypal or Everquest on a regular bases

I think the only reason why Jelsoft doesn't want to go towards the ezBoard model is its complexity and lost of revenue. If this hacked had offered less control than an administrator, it would probably encourage users to get the full version of vBulletin rather than using a hosting solution.

More to a point, Kier is product manager and I don't think he felt this hack represented vBulletin properly.

This hack could violate another agreement, and that would be profiting. Imagine if someone charged money for hosting....and hosted a gazillion vBulletin hostees, well they would be profiting more than Jelsoft and that would be putting Jelsoft out of business.

A very similar idea/concept would be buying a single copy of Windows and installing it on a dozen computers.

That's basically what this hack is doing..

Having a person buy a single copy of vBulletin and having multiple individual UNIQUE boards running.