[FASherman]

Originally Posted by Kier

This one line causes the vBHosting hack to break the license agreement.

Even if you don't think it breaks the letter of license agreement, it is certainly contrary to the spirit of the license agreement, which is one license for one board.

Of course this is only your opinion and, as such, is non-binding. The only way you can elevate this assertion from opinion to fact is through a court finding. Should you choose to do so, the burden of proof is on Jelsoft. The hack user need not prove the negative of the assertion, but can certainly show through history that the hack merely does via automation what others have done for years manually. Your lack of enforcement in that matter will indicate implicit acceptance of this arrangement as NOT in violation. Hence the hack user, and the hack by extension, will be found to be not in violation of either the letter or the spirit because it merely automates that which you have given implicit acceptance of in the past.

Jelsoft CANNOT win this one.