[Bison]

I voted NO because I believe the initial intent was to develop an application that allow users a easier method of installing the hack first and it does a very poor job at that. I've tested the program on a clean set of code and it still couldn't find lines of code to insert the hack. When I generated the text file and searched for the code myself, all tha lines that the program couldn't find were found pretty easy!

I assume that the author knew when developing this application, that a previous hacked board would nullify the process, and put in this alternative method. It's the only part of the program that works ...

So in summary, it doesn't do was it was intially intended to do! The string compare process doesn't compensate for line breaks, and modified code. From what I observed, the file that needs to be modified, HAS to be structured Line, by line with no wrap around functions.

It was a great idea with good intent but better suited for creating text file instructions which is it's strong part.